Wednesday, 29 August 2012

Damn the Jewish People of the Book!

Muslims killing Jews. 

“Believe in My [Allah’s] revelation [the Koran], which is confirming your [the Jews] scriptures; do not be the first one to deny My revelation… Do not mix the Truth with falsehood, or knowingly conceal the truth.” – Koran, 2:40-42

Many Muslims claims that when Muhammad first arrived in Medina the Jewish tribes reacted peacefully to him and accepted his civil leadership.

One of the reasons why the Jews acquiesced, Muslims argue, is that many Jews believed - or hoped - that Muhammad would eventually convert to Judaism and thus increase Jewish power in central Arabia. This is in contrast to the well-known historical fact that Judaism has never been a proselytising religion. Islam, on the other hand, has always been a proselytising (or converting) religion. Indeed this is seen when Muslims tell us that, at this time, several Jewish families converted to Islam (rather than Muslim families being converted to Islam).

It is claimed that the case of dispute between Jew and Muslim occurred because the Jews were angry that Muhammad did not convert to Judaism.

The story then continues that as a result of Muhammad’s non-conversion to Judaism, as well as other things, that

“Jewish clan leaders began a vicious propaganda campaign against Muhammad, and a lot of slanderous talk was directed at Muslims [by the Jews].”

Indeed, because the Jews didn’t convert to Islam, it is not surprising that, as a result, Muhammad thought that such Jewish “tribes were not examples of the best in Judaism.”

Of course, it wasn’t only Jewish non-conversion that angered Muhammad. The Koran itself accused these Jews of the following:

i)                 Of practising racial discrimination and hypocrisy.
ii)              Of not following the teachings of Moses and that their customs had no authority from God [Allah].
iii)           Of not accepting Muhammad as a new prophet despite the fact that ‘Jewish leaders often predicted to the Arabs [at that time] that a new prophet would come and destroy them and their idols.”

There are other aspects of Judaism that the Koran questions and then condemns:

i)                 ‘Jewish law is overly harsh without sanction from God [Allah].’ – Koran, 2:140
ii)              ‘Rabbis have not done a good job of influencing their people to lead moral lives.’ – Koran, 5:78:81
iii)           ‘The Jews of Medina engaged in slander and misinformation in their intrigues against Islam, and they publicly taunted and were disrespectful of the prophet Muhammad.’ – Koran, 4:46
iv)            ‘Jews assert that Abraham and his immediate descendents were Jewish, but that is rejected in the Qur’an.’ – Koran, 2:140

More importantly than all this. Yes Muslims saw – and still see - the Jews as a ‘People of the Book’. But was/is that a good thing? Not for the Jews then or Jews today. Precisely because they were a People of the Book Muhammad expected the Jews ‘to look at Islam and accept it as the best expression of the messages of Abraham and Moses’. There’s more than that. Muslims believed that by
 “accepting Islam… the Jewish people can perfect their faith and bring themselves back under the terms of the covenant between Moses and God [Allah]…”

But the Jews, on the whole, didn’t do any of these things. The People of the Book (quite rightly so) rejected Muhammad and Islam and what they claimed about Abraham, Moses and so on. So rather than Jews being People of the Book giving them a positive status in Islam, it does the exact opposite! The Koran shows us, or tells us, that Jews were wrong to reject Muhammad. That they were a sinful and bad people. And then, of course, as we have seen, the Koran lays out a whole list of Jewish sins, crimes and vices. So much for being a People of the Book!

It is not surprising, then, that conflict occurred between the Jews and Muslims of Medina and Arabia. More correctly, it is no surprise that Muhammad himself decided to crackdown and even annihilate the Jews of that area and beyond.

Many Muslims argue that when Muhammad was alive, the Jewish tribes of Medina, and no doubt elsewhere in Arabia and the Arab world generally, played one Arab tribe against another and, in so doing, asserted a certain political dominance there. This clashes with the often-repeated historical fact that it was Arab tribes themselves who were always fighting one another - without the malign influence of the Jews. After all, Islam, or Muhammad himself, reacted against a fierce and obsessive Arabic tribalism that simply didn’t require the Jews, or anyone else, to get them to fight one another, just like they do to this very day. 

Again, Muslims portray this bit of history from a Muslim perspective or bias. They say that Jewish ‘tribes engaged the Muslims in battle’. And that the ‘first tribe to pick a fight with the Muslims was the Banu Qaynuqa’. So, isn’t it strange that given the warlike nature of Muhammad and his fellow Muslims, which Muslims acknowledge and are even proud of, it was Jewish tribes who ‘engaged Muslims in battle’ and the not the other way around? That it was the Banu Qaynuqa tribe that ‘picked a fight’ and not any of the Muslim tribes? 

It is all this which clearly explains the well-known Koranic feature of ‘abrogation’. That is, in the parts of the Koran which discuss Muhammad’s early career, when he knew the Jews and didn’t want to push them too far and too soon. Thus the Koran is seemingly sympathetic towards the Jews and Judaism and even speaks of ‘peace’ between them. However, as Muslims themselves acknowledge, “the Qur’an grew increasingly harsh in its tone as all the aforementioned events unfolded.” In other words, Muhammad and his cronies kept on changing the Qu'ran at will and whenever the situation called for, new verses were "revealed".

Yet despite all this Muslim acknowledgement of conflict with a People of the Book, even today Muslims still betray an unquestioning attitude to all Muhammad’s actions in this period – conflict or no conflict. They still believe that

“Muhammad kept his end of the treaties at all times, and many Jews converted to Islam of their own free will. He never forced any conversions nor did he act in an unjust manner.”

There’s more of the same:

“The expulsion of the three organised Jewish tribes was due to their own duplicity and treachery.” 

One conclusion you can make about all this is that Muslims seem intent on fostering the idea that they were not against Judaism per se, but they were against the Jews! Thus the antipathy in often painted, indirectly and often unknowingly, as being more ethnically- or even racially-based than strictly religious.

For example, this writer says that ‘Islam is not anti-Jewish’. Instead it merely ‘considers the collective failure of the Jewish people to live up to God’s [Allah’s] revelations’.

It was not Judaism that was at fault, despite the fact that Muhammad clearly did think that as well, but the Jews themselves. This, clearly, is as close to pure ethnic - or even racial - prejudice as you could possibly get without being unhistorical.

- By PAM

JDL UK Team 

Was there really a Jewish/Muslim love-in prior to 1948?

Dhimmi Jew in Medieval Spain

Can you believe it? Many Muslims (And also some ignorant mainly European Jews) believe, or pretend to believe, that there was a ‘long history of mutual tolerance between Jews and Muslims’ in the Middle East, and elsewhere, which only came to an end in 1948 – when the state of Israel was founded.

Yes, it is sometimes true that Jews were more severely persecuted in Christian Europe than in the Muslim-Arab world. Or, rather, we should say that it was often the case that Jews were more severely treated and oppressed in Europe than in the Muslim Middle East. But this was not always and everywhere the case. At many times, and in many places, things were just as bad for Jews in the Islamic world than they were in Europe. It depends. It depends on the precise period and the precise location we are talking about.

So let’s talk about Jewish oppression and persecution in the Muslim world (way) before 1948. Here are just a few examples:

i) In the ninth century, Baghdad’s Caliph al-Mutawakki designated a yellow badge to be worn by Iraq’s Jews. The Nazis took over this Muslim example in the 1930s.

ii) In 1465, Muslims in Fez (Morocco) killed thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive. This was after a Jew had treated a Muslim woman in ‘an offensive manner’. (Oh! That Muslim word – ‘offensive’!) These preliminary killings sparked off other massacres throughout Morocco. (And so that you know, this is how the actual 'fez' hat came into existence). One of the Muslim murderers dipped his turban in the blood of the Jews he killed and then put it back on his head. Soon enough the rest copied him. And later a specific red blood hat called Fez was created.

iii) In Libya in 1785, Ali Belsi Pasha murdered hundreds of Jews.

iv) More up to date. In Algeria there were Jewish massacres in 1805, 1815 and 1830. Thousands were murdered.

v) There were many decrees that ordered the destruction of synagogues in Egypt and Syria (1014, 1293-4, 1301-2), Iraq (854-859, 1344) and Yemen (1676).

vi) Jews were forced to convert to Islam or face death in Yemen (1165 and 1678), Morocco (1272, 1465 and 1790-92) and Baghdad (1333 and 1344).

vii) And even more up to date (but still pre-1948). Thousands of Jews were killed in anti-Jewish riots in the early 1940s in Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria and Yemen. It was these events that forced the mass exodus of Jews (over 850,000) from these Muslim countries to the no-man's land of Palestine and then to Israel. (No! Not all new Israelis were from Eastern Europe or New York! This of course is Muslim propaganda).

viii) More importantly and relevantly. Take that example of supreme Muslim/Jewish tolerance – the Spain of the Muslim ‘Golden Age’. In 1066, Joseph HaNagid, the Jewish vizier of Granada, was crucified by an Arab mob that subsequently went on to burn-to-the-ground the Jewish quarter of the city killing its 5,000 inhabitants. The riot was brought about by Muslim religious leaders who had taken a dislike to Jewish political influence in Granada and in other parts of Spain.

We saw in note viii) that not even in golden-age Spain was there the Jewish/Muslim love-in the Church of Inter-Faith tries to sell us. For example, the convert to Islam (or ‘revert’ as they love to claim), Yahiya Emerick, enters the world of the absurd by stating that
“Jewish citizens of the [Islamic] empire had rights nearly equal to their rights in America today.” 

It’s simply not the case. This is a ridiculous thing to say. It is even hard to make sense of it at all. How on earth could any Middle-Age system of rights in the Islamic world, or anywhere else for that matter, be compared to the system of rights in contemporary America? This is an obscene case of extreme retrospectivism and anachronism. The claim is on a par with the very same writer’s belief that Islam believed in ‘animal rights’, ‘women’s rights’ and would have been against nuclear weapons. In certain respects, rights simply didn’t exist in this period – certainly not rights as the were promulgated by the American Founding Fathers and later in the 20th century generally. Muslims get very confused with the word "rights". 

If Jews had equal rights, or even American-style rights, why were they the victims of the following? 

i) Why were Jews excluded from public office and the armed services in many Muslim lands prior to 1948 – often far before 1948?

ii) Why were Jews not allowed to ride horses or camels, to build synagogues taller than mosques, to construct houses (homes) which were higher than those of Muslims or to drink wine in public?

iii) Why were Jews forced to wear distinctive clothing and not allowed to pray or mourn in loud voices as that might have offended (!) Muslims?

iv) Why did Jews have to show public deference towards Muslims, for example, by always having to yield them the centre of the road?

v) Why were Jews not allowed to give evidence in court against a Muslim, as his oath was unacceptable in an Islamic court?

As H.E.W Young, British Vice Council in Mosul, wrote in 1909:

“The attitude of the Muslims towards the… Jews is that of masters towards slaves, whom he treats with a certain lordly tolerance so long as they keep their place. Any sign of pretension to equality is promptly repressed.”

The trick is, of course, not to brainlessly accept this far-too-neat schematisation:

Pre-1948 Jewish/Muslim relations = good
Pre-1948 Jewish/Christian (European) relations = bad

This is far too simplistic and is often nothing more than propaganda on the Muslim’s/Palestinian’s part. Instead, we should accept G.E. von Grunebaum’s more sophisticated account of Jewish/Muslim interrelations throughout history. He wrote:

“It would not be difficult to put together the names of a very sizable number of Jewish subjects or citizens of the Islamic era who have attained to high rank…” 

Even during the Islamic Golden Age it would still be fair to say, as Grunebaum does, that

“it would again not be difficult to compile a lengthy list of persecutions, arbitrary confiscations, attempted forced conversions, or pogroms [of the Jews].” 

It is also important to say that this very pseudo-beneficence towards Jews, when and where it occurred, was largely a result of the fact that the Islamic empire(s) needed the Jews to help them prosper and thrive, just as it needed infidel Persians, Byzantines, Hindus, Spanish Christians and whatnot. That is, without the labour and brains of the Jews, and of other dhimmis, there would never have been an Islamic empire of any description. Muslim jihadists would have conquered easily enough, but very soon after each conquest their regimes would have disintegrated. Muslim warriors alone would never have created Islamic empires – or any kind of empire.

So let’s recap.

It’s commonly thought, by many Muslims (plus others), that everything was fine and dandy between Jews and Muslims before 1948. (Even if they admit that there were a few tiny hiccups.) This is pure propaganda. Specifically, it is propaganda against the state of Israel and, in the end, against the Jews (as Jews) again. In fact I don’t even believe that Muslims really believe any of this. As I said, it does good work as a piece of Islamic or pro-Palestinian propaganda.

Yahiya Emerick (again) even has the audacity to say that

“save for the modern Arab-Israeli conflict, relations between Jews and Muslims have been quite friendly for over a thousand years.” 

This, again, is pure propaganda. More than that. It is Islamic taqiyya – Islamic deceit. Emerick simply could not have really believed that his words were even moderately true. He was, quite simply, lying when he wrote the above (plus much else). And that’s what many other Muslims do when they defend Islam both in the Church of Inter-Faith and even in the real world.

The issue however is the disturbing trend we see among Jews who also tend to believe in such lies, and which cause tremendous harm to Israel and the Jewish future by consequence of their ignorant actions.

The fact that the Jews have lived "side by side" with Muslims in the past, and many still do to this day, is not proof that Muslims are civilized or tolerant of their religion - or any other religion in fact.

See here for more facts and details of the persecution of Jews. 

Written by P. Murphy for JDL UK 

Thursday, 23 August 2012

The only sex assault scandal in the Olympic games came from the Paralympic Palestinians from Jordan

Trainer Faisal Hammash (left) and fellow assaulters Power lifter Omar Sami Qaradhi (centre) and Motaz Al Junaidi (right)

Three Arab-Palestinian men from the Jordanian Paralympic team have been charged with sexual assault against females a week before the London 2012 Paralympic Games begin.
The Jordanian-Palestinian squad is training in County Antrim in Northern Ireland, and the sexual assaults are said to have taken place at the Antrim Forum.

Although only three Palestinian Jordanians have been charged, there have been others who were indirectly involved in these assaults.

Power lifter Omar Sami Qaradhi, 31, who lives in Barbados faces three charges of sexual assault, two against a child, and one of voyeurism after allegedly entering a women's changing room at the Antrim Forum leisure centre.

Trainer Faisal Hammash, 35, is accused of inciting (more like forcing) two girls to engage in sexual activity.

Mr Cahir said he was “merely photographing” the girls in the Antrim area, including on a riverside walk beside the Antrim Forum, as if this could exonerate him from a crime of voyeurism and possibly complicity.

Power lifter Motaz Al Junaidi, 45, who won bronze at the last Paralympics in Beijing, is also accused of sexual assault.

Now the King of Palestinian Jordan has stepped into the equation to show he is “doing something” about it. His Arab administration stated that they will bring the perpetrators back to face court charges in Coleraine, Co Londonderry if they were granted bail. So bail was given at the cost of £5,500 each and they were told to make contact with the Jordanian embassy in London before their next appearance in court, which will be October 18th 2012.  

“The police said  Omar Sami Qaradhi was identified by a girl aged 14 who said that on August 18 she posed for photos with him before he groped her between the legs in the town centre of Antrim.  The same day, a girl aged 16 said she was walking along the river path beside Antrim Forum, one of Northern Ireland's largest multi-sports centres, with a friend when their path was blocked by the three accused.  Police alleged that the girl was pushed by one of the men towards Omar, who placed his arm around her waist, tightening his grip, but then she ran away.  
Tony Cahir, a solicitor for three accused, said Omar had not had any legs since birth and was incapable of sexual gratification.”  (Since when “legless” people are incapable of sexual gratification? What utter rubbish!)

Once again we see people trying to defend Muslims who commit sexual assault on non-Muslims., including defending paedophilia.
These people were invited here as athletes to participate in the Paralympic games. Why do they disgrace themselves and their countries by acting like animals? If these charges are true, they should be expelled from the games, charged and punished accordingly.

The article from the Standard states:  

“One of the alleged victims came forward and made claims against Motaz after police had begun their investigation and several days after the disputed incident. Mr Cahir said wheelchair user Motaz was born with polio. He is married with four children.”  (As if this disability would stop him from sexually assaulting females).
“He added: "Now the authorities seek to deny him that opportunity which is his life's ambition, to participate in the Paralympic Games and hopefully win a gold medal for his country.” 

The authorities are not denying any true athlete to perform and win medals for their country, and no one forced him to assault the girls. If these men cannot control their genitalia like civilized people, they should not be allowed to roam free in civilized countries.  We in Britain do not appreciate such immoral and depraved behaviour.  When such behaviour comes from athletes is particularly disturbing, as athletes are supposed to be exemplary models, people we look up to. Obviously these ones fall short from any admiration.

See more about these news in the following articles:

JDL UK Team 

Wednesday, 22 August 2012

"All European Life Died In Auschwitz"

"Europe died in Auschwitz .. We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world."

The following is a copy of an article written by Spanish writer Sebastian Vilar Rodriguez and published in a Spanish newspaper on Jan. 15, 2008. It doesn’t take much imagination to extrapolate the message to the rest of Europe – and possibly to the rest of the world.

Do not just delete this message; it will take only a minute to pass this along.

All European Life Died in Auschwitz By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez

I walked down the street in Barcelona , and suddenly discovered a terrible truth – Europe died in Auschwitz .. We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of the Jewish people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned.

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.

Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe …

The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000; that is ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION or 20% of the world’s population. They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

1988 – Najib Mahfooz

1978 – Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
1990 – Elias James Corey
1994 – Yaser Arafat:
1999 – Ahmed Zewai



1960 – Peter Brian Medawar
1998 – Ferid Mourad


The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000; that is FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world’s population. They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

1910 – Paul Heyse
1927 – Henri Bergson
1958 – Boris Pasternak
1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 – Nelly Sachs
1976 – Saul Bellow
1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 – Elias Canetti
1987 – Joseph Brodsky
1991 – Nadine Gordimer World

1911 – Alfred Fried
1911 – Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 – Rene Cassin
1973 – Henry Kissinger
1978 – Menachem Begin
1986 – Elie Wiesel
1994 – Shimon Peres
1994 – Yitzhak Rabin

1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 – Henri Moissan
1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
1910 – Otto Wallach
1915 – Richard Willstaetter
1918 – Fritz Haber
1921 – Albert Einstein
1922 – Niels Bohr
1925 – James Franck
1925 – Gustav Hertz
1943 – Gustav Stern
1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 – Felix Bloch
1954 – Max Born
1958 – Igor Tamm
1959 – Emilio Segre
1960 – Donald A. Glaser
1961 – Robert Hofstadter
1961 – Melvin Calvin
1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 – Julian Schwinger
1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
1971 – Dennis Gabor
1972 – William Howard Stein
1973 – Brian David Josephson
1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
1976 – Burton Richter
1977 – Ilya Prigogine
1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
1978 – Peter L Kapitza
1979 – Stephen Weinberg
1979 – Sheldon Glashow
1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
1980 – Paul Berg
1980 – Walter Gilbert
1981 – Roald Hoffmann
1982 – Aaron Klug
1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
1985 – Jerome Karle
1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 – Robert Huber
1988 – Leon Lederman
1988 – Melvin Schwartz
1988 – Jack Steinberger
1989 – Sidney Altman
1990 – Jerome Friedman
1992 – Rudolph Marcus
1995 – Martin Perl
2000 – Alan J. Heeger

1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 – Simon Kuznets
1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
1976 – Milton Friedman
1978 – Herbert A. Simon
1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 – Franco Modigliani
1987 – Robert M. Solow
1990 – Harry Markowitz
1990 – Merton Miller
1992 – Gary Becker
1993 – Robert Fogel

1908 – Elie Metchnikoff
1908 – Paul Erlich
1914 – Robert Barany
1922 – Otto Meyerhof
1930 – Karl Landsteiner
1931 – Otto Warburg
1936 – Otto Loewi
1944 – Joseph Erlanger
1944 – Herbert Spencer Gasser
1945 – Ernst Boris Chain
1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 – Tadeus Reichstein
1952 – Selman Abraham Waksman
1953 – Hans Krebs
1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 – Joshua Lederberg
1959 – Arthur Kornberg
1964 – Konrad Bloch
1965 – Francois Jacob
1965 – Andre Lwoff
1967 – George Wald
1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 – Salvador Luria
1970 – Julius Axelrod
1970 – Sir Bernard Katz
1972 – Gerald Maurice Edelman
1975 – Howard Martin Temin
1976 – Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 – Roselyn Sussman Yalow
1978 – Daniel Nathans
1980 – Baruj Benacerraf
1984 – Cesar Milstein
1985 – Michael Stuart Brown
1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 – Gertrude Elion
1989 – Harold Varmus
1991 – Erwin Neher
1991 – Bert Sakmann
1993 – Richard J. Roberts
1993 – Phillip Sharp
1994 – Alfred Gilman
1995 – Edward B. Lewis
1996- Lu RoseIacovino
TOTAL: 129!

The Jews are NOT promoting brain washing children in military training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims. The Jews don’t hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics, or blow themselves up in German restaurants. There is NOT one single Jew who has destroyed a church. There is NOT a single Jew who protests by killing people.

The Jews don’t traffic slaves, nor have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.

Perhaps the world’s Muslims should consider investing more in standard education and less in blaming the Jews for all their problems.

Muslims must ask ‘what can they do for humankind’ before they demand that humankind respects them.

Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between Israel and the Palestinians and Arab neighbors, even if you believe there is more culpability on Israel ‘s part, the following two
sentences really say it all:

‘If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel .” Benjamin Netanyahu

General Eisenhower Warned Us It is a matter of history that when the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps he ordered all possible photographs to be taken, and for the German people from surrounding villages to be ushered through the camps and even made to bury the dead.

He did this because he said in words to this effect:

‘Get it all on record now – get the films – get the witnesses – because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened’

Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its school curriculum because it ‘offends’ the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving into it.

It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in Europe ended. This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the, 6 million Jews, 20 million Russians, 10 million Christians, and 1,900 Catholic priests who were ‘murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on and humiliated’ while the German people looked the other way.

Now, more than ever, with Iran , among others, claiming the Holocaust to be ‘a myth,’ it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets.

This e-mail is intended to reach 400 million people. Be a link in the memorial chain and help distribute this around the world.

How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center ‘NEVER HAPPENED’ because it offends some Muslim in the United States ?

Do not just delete this message; it will take only a minute to pass this along.

 Jewish Defence League UK

Monday, 20 August 2012

Video: Man Arrested In Canada For Walking His Dog On Al-Quds Day

As the Jewish Defence League countered the Al-Quds day in Toronto (Article Here) A man was arrested for simply walking his dog near the Muslims who were spewing their bile and lies about Israel.
Update: The subject of this report has received his 1st threatening phone call; "We are going to kill you, you dirty jew"
Toronto Police Services Arrest Man For Walking His Dog On Al-Quds Day
It's touching how O' Canada is being sung in the background as this event unfolds.

"I was arrested at the rally for, "offending Islam" by walking in a PUBLIC park with my dog. Apparently, Muslims do not like dogs. I was warned by a few demonstrators not to go near them. Of course I ignored them and reminded them this is Canada, not Pakistan. Well I was assaulted and returned the favor in kind.
At that point I was jumped by four COPS, dragged off and hand cuffed. Oh my the police were so angry! They said I was, "insensitive" and "inciting a riot". 30 minutes later they cut me a big deal. No charges if I left. So I left. Imagine this happening in Canada? Walking a licensed dog on a leash at the park in front of our Provincial Legislature and being arrested for that simple act!"

NB: This is a therapy dog. Works at hospitals.
 Jewish Defence League UK

Jewish Defence League Counter Al-Quds Rally In Toronto

Peace broke out in Toronto Saturday afternoon when competing ideas and raised voices were the only exchanges in an ongoing annual meeting of  ideologies.
A controversial rally marking Al-Quds Day and a counter-rally by the Jewish Defence League (JDL) met a group of expatriate Iranians in front of the Ontario legislature as part of the yearly exchange.
Al-Quds Day was made a global event by the late Ayatollah Khomeini to mark the end of Ramadan and to call for the establishment of a Palestinian state. Last year’s Queen’s Park rally garnered attention due to Muslim journalist Zafar Bangash calling Israeli nationalists “oppressors and criminals.”
Howard Davidson from Independent Jewish Voices says the organization supports a “call for the end of war crimes committed by Israel.”
“To name them as crimes is only to name the truth,” he said.
Chants included: “Zionism is racism”, “God loves Israel”, and “down with the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
A verbal spat between a man and a woman resulted in her asking him: “Would you like to kill all the Muslims in the world?” to which he replied “100%.”
When asked about the exchanged words, JDL spokesman Meir Weinstein said “some studies have shown 10% of Muslims support terrorist groups.”
“That means 90% don’t, according to the study,” he said. “But there’s about 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, and if 10% of that support terrorist groups, there’s a serious problem.”
Weinstein maintained the JDL was there to peacefully oppose the rally.
“Anyone’s allowed to join us, provided they’re not coming to disrupt,” he said.
The demonstrations were also marred by a brief scuffle. Toronto Police’s 52 Division confirmed there were no arrests made.
As spokesman for the Islamic group holding the Al-Quds Day rally, Bangash said “we represent the true Canadian values.”
“We are not here to spread hatred,” he said. “We are here to support the rights of the Palestinian people.”
As crowds grew, Toronto Police erected a barrier with police bicycles between the two sides. Iranians stood on the JDL side and waved the pre-revolution flag, featuring a lion, along with denouncing the current Iranian regime.
“We’re here to say we don’t want Islamic regime supporters in Canada,” activist Sayeah Hassan said.
Jewish Defence League UK

Friday, 17 August 2012

A snapshot of some of our "followers"..., the Nazi anti-semite, Holocaust denier group:

 08-15-2012, 08:59 AM   #12
The White Way Home UK
Forum Member

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 269

 Re: Jewish terror gang sets up UK Chapter
The fact is that Jews are never properly listed as "terrorists", you would think they would be, the way they respond to a single suicide bomber. How can a "nation" get away with sending helicopter gunships to fire upon and bomb refugee camps and get away with it? It's because they are Jews and all had relatives that were "murdered by nazis" during ww2.

I received an email from the so called UKJDL when I was organising down here and moderating another forum. I just deleted it like I did any other junk. Honestly whoever it was came accross like a juvenile head banger. If and when they actually do something, then I'll take em seriously, but not until.

Forum Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,803

 Re: Jewish terror gang sets up UK Chapter
The American FBI telling us how scary they are could be a means of trying to draw attention away. This group could set up by/with the collusion of UK anti-Nationalist groups (or even the Gvt itself). It could be done with the express intent of trying to goad Nationalists into violence. It seems strange how, all of a sudden, with the UK economy disappearing down the toilet in unpayable debt, some shady group 'just happens' to decide it wants to 'defend' Jews.
When was the last time you read about Jews being beaten up/petrol bombed etc by a group of neo-'Nazis'?
Exactly, never.
And aren't there already six million laws in place to 'protect' (ie promote at our expense) all the establishment's pet ethnics?

Something smells Zoggy to me.

London Renaissance
Forum Member

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,531

 Re: Jewish terror gang sets up UK Chapter
I don't doubt that these people have strong links to the Community Security Trust (or whatever it's called), Searchlight, Hope Not Hate and the British and israeli security services generally.

Oh dear!! Nothing more recent? Bwahahaha!!!

Wednesday, 15 August 2012

JDL Exclusive: The Oslo Years - 20 Years On

Baruch Marzel, third from right. Itamar Ben Gvir, far right

Yesterday was a pretty good day, in some ways. I spent the morning protesting alongside Baruch Marzel and Itamar Ben Gvir outside the Yizhak Rabin Center, a leftist haven, taunting those responsible for the catastrophic Oslo Accords. Then I raced home to send my video to Itamar, only to have the video footage I shot on the evening news, and in most online newspapers.

The only downside to the day was our reason for being there, the leftist establishment in Israel were gathering for the anniversary of the second Rabin administration, in order to celebrate (?) what led to the Oslo Accords.

Attended by the upper echelons of the left, including Israel's very own Jimmy Carter, President Shimon Peres (who drove past us as we made our way there). There was no mention of the fact that George Bush Sr. helped engineer the ousting of Yizhak Shamir as PM (by aiding the creation of several rightist groups before the elections, thus destroying Shamir's vote allowing Rabin to win). But it was a rather fitting start to Rabin's government, an administration which would go on to award 'peace' talks with people who made little effort to hide their intent towards Israel. This after the first intifada, several years of rioting (jihad) by the Arabs inspired by the mujahadin's 'victory' in Afghanistan against the Soviets, during that decade. Also too Arafat was finished. His Soviet backers were gone, and his Saudi sponsors angry at him for siding with Saddam against them during the 1991 Gulf War. 

So in effect, Rabin not only brought on Oslo, he revived Arafat and re-armed Arafat's henchmen who were preparing for the 2nd intifada (really a continuation of the jihad), allowing a further 1,000 Israelis to be butchered. The truce for Arafat then was a classic Islamic tactic to buy more time until he was strong enough to continue the jihad, a tactic used by Mohammed himself against the tribe of Hudabiyya.

Then, when Bill Clinton came to office and found that not only was being seen to pursue peace a vote-winner, but the fact that it distracted from sex scandals at home meant Clinton pursued that all important breakthrough at the expense of everything else, including Israel's security.

With Itamar’s banner, he continually threw the fact that over 1,000 Jews have been killed since the signing of the Oslo Accords (and directly because of them), but to no avail. The response from those attending the party ranged from indifference to ridicule to anger (anger that they were being held responsible for their actions).

In the end, and the incident that made headline news was Itamar confronting Rabin’s granddaughter telling her her father’s behaviour was criminal. The ensuing hysteria from Noa Rotman caught everyone’s attention (I was the only one with video rolling).

(Hebrew only for the time being, sorry) 

If we could forgive her for what she felt about her grandfather, we couldn't forgive her for what she didn't feel. As Rotman screamed at Itamar, the message behind what she was saying was clear. Because Rabin was assassinated by someone of our political persuasion, we were to blame for his death. But Rabin, who headed the government which signed the Oslo Accords allowing so many thousands of Jews to die as a result, was not responsible. It was clear she did not question her grandfather's legacy in any way shape or form. In addition, she was clearly more upset that her grandfather had been killed rather than the thousands of Jews massacred. But why should she even consider it when Yizhak Rabin has been elevated to the level of a deity. It's almost as if we'll next hear that because Rabin was assassinated, peace wasn't achieved.

How sad and narrow is the perspective of those inhabiting the world of the left...

The Oslo years have been 20 of the most bloody in Israeli history, and around here that’s saying something. The figure of over 1,000 Jews killed is true, but that only relates to the 2nd intifada, which raged from 2000 to (around) 2003. In fact from the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1994 until the 2nd intifada, more Jews were killed in that period alone than had been killed by terrorism since the founding of the state (1948 - 1994).
Tom Gross Media
Then, as part of Oslo, democracy was put on hold temporarily as one of the most heinous acts in Israeli politics was ever committed (and in Israeli politics that’s saying something too) with the evacuation of thousands of Jews from their land in Gaza. The rockets haven’t stopped falling since.

But the arrogant indifference shown by those officials yesterday is exactly the same type of callous attitude displayed by Ehud Olmert (PM from 2005-2009) in a TV debate with Meir Kahane (Z”L) in the early ‘80s. Long before Oslo was imposed upon us.

At one point Olmert admits that Jews are killed by Arabs on an almost daily basis. He then states that “within this context when a person like Rabbi Kahane comes along and provokes the emotions of people it has some impact on them.”

So at one and the same time, Olmert not only places blame for Israeli anger at being killed at the feet of Kahane, but there’s the added gem of Stalin-like contempt for the people which says that we’re so stupid, we can’t make up our minds on an issue like being murdered (I don't know about anyone else but I've heard dying is bad for your health).

Here's the whole thing:

Picture Source
Standing there yesterday watching the arguments kind of felt like we were trying to warn people about 9/11 on the 10th of September. But it wasn’t a day before some imminent attack, it is twenty years later. And these politicians refuse to accept any responsibility for the tragic loss of life. Like all the world leaders during the Shoah who knew, but did nothing; like those living in one of the many communist hell holes of the 20th century, everywhere they look is horror, but they have manufactured their own little imaginary worlds in which they do not to see it, in order to continue doing what they do. Unlike the 100 million souls who perished under the tyranny of communist rule, these leaders do have a choice. They can walk away at any time and start representing the interests of the people who put them in power.

But they won't. They’ve repeated the Newspeak to themselves so much that it has become comfortable, in the same way a drug addiction is ‘comfortable’. It is comfortable because it is familiar. Like an exclusive club, and to reject the familiar is to open the door of uncertainty, it would mean immediately being shunned by colleagues and would require searching for new answers. The first and most obvious objection they would have is to admit they have been wrong. The second problem means they would have to look for different answers, which could lead them in the other direction, the path of actually having to fight to defend their country and their people. That would also mean having to admit that we, and Kahane were right all along.