Friday, 25 November 2011

The Left in Israel

Here is a picture from a lecture I attended this week in Tel Aviv University. It was about 'the violence of the right wing', and in the picture we can see a student at the podium with a symbol on her t-shirt calling for an intifada, much like the riots witnessed in Britain earlier this year, which have claimed thousands of Jewish lives in the past. 

In other words, the organizers were holding an event to make themselves feel morally justified over their victims (Jews), claiming that their targets should be murdered because the Jewish right to land is non-existent.

In a small detail which these leftists obviously overlooked, just outside the lecture hall were some glass cabinets showing ancient archaeological finds - Jewish remains - consisting mostly of pottery. Each of those several thousand years old.

Adding to this irony (the Left's speciality), in a remarkable display of segregationist mentality (one is tempted to say apartheid – you know, in the proper sense of the word) entry was refused to Michal Ben Ari MK (Member of Knesset). Is there any other country in the world that would be able to get away with refusing a Member of Parliament, or a Congressman/woman entry into a public lecture?

So what was the attitude outside the lecture hall where an unlikely crew of skinny students barred entry for Jews? Was there debate about the issues, was there an impromptu discussion as both sides tackled what each of them saw as the heart of each other’s positions? Nope. There was silence, effectively. There was everything other than debate.

When the left have nothing to say to you, they'll often resort to doing anything, as long as it doesn't involve engaging intellectually.
Sometimes they’ll descend into mockery or sarcasm by saying 'uh-huh, yeahhh, ahhh okay' whilst you’re talking, in an attempt to make you feel stupid. Of course here, the intention was to show total contempt, as if what anyone says is not worthy of a reply, and only worthy of filming for their amusement later on.

And this is very much to do with the philosophical base of the left.

The leftists can partly be forgiven for not answering any points made by the group of Jewish students wanting to get in, because they don’t have any answers (the left’s ideological base is not grounded in facts, but rhetoric). And when watching leftist come up against Jews that have studied the Talmud or been to a yeshiva (religious school), well, watching the left try to debate them is a little like watching a hunter shooting eggs in a nest... cruel I know, but fun nonetheless!

It was Socrates, the ancient Greek, that so inspired Western civilisation with his cross examinations (logic); it was the Jewish Talmudic tradition of dissecting every thought with questions - curiosity/intellectual freedom - that provided a core base from which science would eventually rise, and in turn the Judeo/Christian civilisation would be born, giving the freedom for all this to develop, including the development of democracy and our courts of law.

Socialism rejects the very core of this creation. The Communist Manifesto recommends ‘Abolition of the family!’1 The left embraces irrationality, emotions over facts and historic revisionism (such as a fictitious 'Palestinian' people with their fictitious history).

During WWII Winston Churchill spoke many times about his contempt for the fascists that were overturning Europe (the same irrational beings that have done the same with the world now). When Churchill spoke about the Nazis and the fact that he 'could not rest knowing he breathes the same air as these people', or that he wouldn't stop until 'every trace, every footprint of theirs has been wiped from this earth', I understood the depth of his feeling. The more I encounter the left, the more I feel this should be my mission, and the mission of every Western loving democratic friend.
Expose them, ridicule them; hold up a mirror in front of them. If they refuse to see how ugly and hypocritical they are (and they will), expose them for everyone else’s amusement.

1 The Communist Manifesto (W/Engels translation of 1888) Penguin edition 2002 p.239

Marx goes on to say “On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeoisie [capitalists, employers] family, based? On capital, on private gain.” He goes on “But this state of things finds its compliment in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians [the workers].” So in other words, the capitalist family exists at the expense of the worker’s family. Of course, while you’d be forgiven for thinking Marx is just crying out a social injustice, the only ‘small’ problem is that if the ‘evil rich capitalist’ family were to disappear (as Marx goes on to advocate), then there’d be no other families. Because the rich families create the jobs in order so that the poorer ones may feed themselves, no matter how undesirable their working conditions at the time.

This example of superficial thinking perfectly encapsulates the left, and explains why so many millions of people died under socialist regimes, even though later regimes (such as the Soviets) had watered Marx down significantly. For more see: Communism: A History by Richard Pipes

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

Obedient Wives Club urges women: Be prostitutes to your husbands

An ISLAMIC group that supports polygamy and originated in Malaysia , is urging women to act like "prostitutes in the bedroom to please their men". And now they have opened a branch in London to preach more of their diatribe to British women. "The Obedient Wives Club is part of a global Ikhwan group which claims polygamy will lead to a harmonious society. It urges women to be submissive and keep their spouses happy in the bedroom. "

Meet Ikhwan vice-president Rohaya Mohamed, the perfect female "doormat" who has absolutely no dignity, integrity or self-respect. 

Rohaya could possibly be forgiven for her ignorance regarding free women's lives in the West but she cannot be forgiven for her utter failure to understand that when men cheat it is because they want to, and that includes polygamy,  and not because we fail as women or because we are not "prostitute enough" for our partners. She also fails to grasp the simple psychological damage that polygamy causes to those who are subjected to it.

Rohaya in her lack of intelligence, go as far as claiming that "women could curb social ills by serving their husbands better than a first class prostitute". Is she for real??
Let me get this right: According to Rohaya if a woman is like a first class prostitute in bed with her husband, she can curb social ills. What "social ills" is this woman referring to? I for one would like to know.

Likewise if a woman is like a prostitute in the bedroom, why then would her husband need polygamy? Prostitutes in the west are not submissive. Far from it, they actually choose who they sleep with and there is no submission in this at all, it's payment up front first, thank you very much!
The submission this ignorant individual is speaking about is simply allowing your man to prostitute himself with as many women as he wants, while the partner still behaves like a whore in the bedroom. Does that make any sense to you? It surely doesn't to me.

The whole point of being like a prostitute in the bedroom, to satisfy your partner, is to ensure that he will not cheat. So praising polygamy is not only plain stupid and wrong, but outrageously immoral. Polygamy is one of society's ills, in case this doormat of a woman does not realise it.

Members of the group, which is run from a Greenwich restaurant (Shame on the owner!) are appearing on a debate about polygamy in London tonight. They say they want to show Muslims in Britain that the practice can work.  Well, they are wasting their time if they think they can convince free women to be submissive and doormat-like to their husbands. They will only expose their lack of self-respect for all to see, and they should be scorned for it at that!

Polygamy is demeaning to women, and reduces women to a mere object in a man's life. Not only that but it is also a sacrilege against the sacredness of marriage before the law.  In Britain polygamy is illegal, and yet I do not see polygamous men jailed for it. Why not? Why is our government turning a blind eye to people of Muslim beliefs when they are committing illegal acts on British soil but when a British man does the same he is immediately punished for it?
Why are we allowing one law for them and another for us? This utter immorality brought to us by Islam and Muslims, has to stop immediately.

The founder of the group, a certain Mohd Ali (A man, no doubt) said there were "misconceptions" about polygamy and "we want to share our experience to show it can work".   What misconceptions is this polygamous and immoral man talking about?
There are no misconceptions that I can see, but a simple observation that polygamy hurts whoever is on the receiving end.
And why is this immoral male prostitute preaching only polygamy for men? Why doesn't he show us his bravery and preach it also for women? Now that is something I would like to see. Let's see how he feels when his own wife cheats on him with several men and thus "curb social ills" as well.

He says: "One of the problems in Malaysia is that there are men who might keep a mistress or go with someone else because they don't have a satisfactory married life".

Well my dear hypocrite, I have a solution for these "problems", although I must say that this is not a "problem" only in Malaysia but all over the world. Some men are cheats. That's life.
But the solution is simple. If a man cheats, divorce him. Problem solved.
What I do not understand is that these people are Muslims and as per their Muslim Sharia law, they should be stoned to death for adultery, which is precisely what polygamy is.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to grasp the fact that if a man is married and he "marries" someone else, he is plainly an adulterer and should be punished according to the laws of his own country/beliefs. So promoting this immorality to people who do not wish to be corrupted by the evils of Islam is plainly wrong.
If a man is not satisfied with his wife, he is free to divorce her and choose another. Why would he opt for the worst of all methods which is to cause as much hurt to his wife as possible, by copulating with another in their very marital home?

This is just one of the evils Islam is bringing to our shores and we should do well in addressing this immorality and ensuring that our laws do not make any provision whatsoever for such people. If they want to be polygamous then they can leave this country and practice their immoral ways according to their religion in the countries they have come from.

Polygamy in Britain is illegal. Let's keep it that way. One sex should never have the upper hand over the other. This is Britain and here males and females are equal before the law. Our law.


Monday, 21 November 2011

St. Paul's Cathedral - What would Jesus do?

An article from Melanie Phillips reads:

The Guardian reports today:   Desecration, defecation and substance abuse are among the issues St Paul's Cathedral has had to cope with because of the protest camp in its churchyard, according to legal documents filed by the City of London Corporation ahead of its attempt to evict activists from the area.  

In a letter to the Corporation a cathedral official, Nicholas Cottam, has reported:   '"Desecration: graffiti have been scratched and painted on to the great west doors of the cathedral, the chapter house door and most notably a sacrilegious message painted on to the restored pillars of the west portico.  

"Human defecation has occurred in the west portico entrance and inside the cathedral on several occasions. Noisy interruption has occurred to spoken and sung Christian services, after repeated requests for quiet. Foul language has frequently been directed at cathedral staff. Noise has frequently carried into the cathedral to the extent that services have been difficult to sustain in any meaningful way."   'Cottam added that alcohol "and other stimulants" appeared to "fuel the noise levels day and night".  

Now what has amused me greatly regarding this article is the fact that the St. Paul's Cathedral authorities are complaining of such anti-social behaviour and yet they were the same authorities who have refused to take action against the occupiers of the square. Frankly I cannot even begin to comprehend such reluctance to take action and yet they bitch about it in private.
Ms. Philips also points this out.

I wouldn't even use words such as hypocrisy for I rather expose these ecclesiastics for the cowards that they are.  If they had been so concerned, then why dump the issue in the City of London corporation? Ah perhaps they want to show how much they "care" for the "poor". Only these people are not poor, they are middle class daddy's children who while camping in their smart tents and screaming their lungs out against Capitalism, think nothing of having a coffee in Starbucks, use their mobile phones  and their laptops (complete with Israeli technology intel inside).  

It is obvious the Church is not only incapable of defending itself against sacrilege, but will try their best to pass the hot potato to others in order to keep appearances.

This reminds me of one of the placards one protester was holding : "What would Jesus do?"

Ah now we are talking!  Get my whip please!


Sunday, 20 November 2011


One of the ways the left works is to silence opposition. It’s not enough to get their message out, they have to stop any opposing information reaching the public, or how else will they get anyone to believe them? And by keeping most people in the dark, this is essentially how socialism has managed to remain within society and culture after the most blood-thirsty century in the history of mankind. And let’s make no mistake about it, the socialists tally amounts to 100 million dead due to the 40 or so regimes it created. This is more or less the same amount of casualties claimed in WWI and WWII combined!1

If you hear that the Crusades were wars of aggression, that these are the principle acts of the Christian world against Islam, which created an overwhelming sense of hostility in the Muslim world which remains to this day, you’re likely to believe it.

If, on the other hand, you hear that the Crusades were launched after four and a half centuries of Islamic colonial expansion, rape, pillage, and the final straw being that of taking Christendom’s most holy city, Jerusalem, then you might think otherwise about the Crusades, and especially about the left's propaganda about Muslims being eternal victims.2

But the same revisionism has happened in Britain and Europe with the Israel-Palestine conflict. Only one side of the story has been told for such a long time, people now believe the Arab narrative; they now believe that there was such a thing as a Palestinian Arab/Muslim presence in the Holy Land going back from time immemorial, and some even believe that Jews have no historic presence there.

This is the way the left works.

Similarly, back in 2003, when Israel was debating evicting Jews from Gaza, the left managed to close down one of the sole voices opposed to the self-ethnic cleansing. A radio station called ‘Arutz Sheva’ (Chanel Seven). Member of Knesset (MK) Zehava Galon, leader of the Meretz Party faction, was instrumental in seeing to it (through the leftist Supreme Court) that the radio station was closed. This happened in October of that year.

With one of the single opposing voices being closed, the communists were left to put its view out, without being challenged by any ‘troublesome’ right wingers, or reality (reality like Israel was at the height of a terror war in 2003 in which over 1000 Israelis had been killed, and to remove any Jewish presence in Gaza might be construed as a reward for that terror).

But as a footnote, it is interesting that in the left’s current narrative of the conflict, these evictions from Gaza have become an inconvenient truth. Any time they attempt to justify rockets fired by Hamas on Israel, they simply remove the most incriminating fact which shows Israel’s actions for peace.

Now however, with a right-wing Likud government in power, we’re seeing the blowback. Benjamin Netanyahu’s party is attempting to pry the left’s vice-like grip on Israel’s public institutions, media and Supreme Court, by passing several ground-breaking bills.

These bills include the main reason for Israel’s poor image around the world, NGOs (Non-Governmental Organisations), having their funding severely restricted; and copying the US practice of interviewing Supreme Court judges before they take office; but one of the most egregious issues being that of NGOs evicting Jews from Judea & Samaria through the law courts (even though illegal Arab construction goes unpunished).

Unsurprisingly, the left aren’t happy. Chief among those is Zehava Galon who said she feels her freedom fading. Let us hope this feeling of hers continues.


1 Casualties for both world wars amounts to roughly 100 million: 35 million in WWI; 60 million in WWII

Robert Spencer’s The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (one of the best introductions to jihad, and the Crusades)

2A Similarly, if you’re Jewish, you might not like the Crusades for their massacre of the Jews in the Rhineland in the First Crusade. But if you heard that the numbers of Jews massacred by Muslims a few years before this atrocity, in Granada, Spain, equalled or exceeded those killed by the Christians (in fact, wiping out the Jewish community there), and that this was nothing compared to what the Muslims did to Jews in Northern Africa, or when they invaded the Holy Land, you might not think better of the Crusaders, but any (rational) person would think far less of the Muslims colonial practices and the fictitious 'Golden Age' of Jews under Islam.

But maybe I’m getting ahead of myself. I think I can hear the left crying out that these Muslims were simply ahead of their time and angry over ’67 (that is, nineteen sixty seven).

Friday, 18 November 2011

Torture, Revolution and a Potential Genocide looming in Iran.

After the 2009 elections in Iran, which were fraudulent, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad clung onto his place in power despite the people of Iran wanting him gone, In response hundreds of thousands of people poured into the city streets of Iran in protest and were met with ruthless and brutal violence from various sectors of the Iranian authourities, the crimes of the Oppresive and brutal regime under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad against his own people were fully revealed and in full view of the world. For decades, even the relatively privileged majorities in Iran have also been systemically oppressed by a corrupt, fanatical, and duplicitous government, while diverse minorities have suffered small forms of oppression that include ongoing intimidation and harassment, imprisonment and torture, disappearance and many executions and rapes have taken place inside Iranian prisons.

Iran's oppression is on par with the regimes such as Stalinist Russia and the 3rd Reich. The victims of these crimes against humanity and freedom of speech in Iran include virtually every religious and ethnic minority in Iran, women’s rights advocates and social reformers, educators and journalists, activists and artists. The most aggrieved victims of these crimes may well be members of the Bahá’í Faith, whose systematic state-sponsored persecution has triggered countless international warnings regarding the early signs of a potential genocide of the Bahá’í.

The oppression and the brutal conditions in Iran have prompted non-violent actions and organizing mass efforts through groups and organizations as the Green Movement, United4Iran and many other campaigns, But unfortunately To date, the Iranian people have so far been unable to free themselves from the yoke of this tyrannical regime. despite their ongoing bravery trying to fight the regime despite being outmanned by the Iranian authourities they still fight back. How then, can the people of Iran realize their dreams of justice?

I think a lesson can be drawn from the experience of the Danish under Nazi occupation in the second world war. The Danish were very resourceful in sheltering Jews from the genocidal campaign of the Nazis and this resulted in one of the highest Jewish survival rates among any occupied country in the second world war. As a result of their efforts, the following story emerged after World War II: When all Danish Jews were ordered to wear a yellow star, so they could be rounded up for the concentration camps, the non-Jewish Danes, led by their King, all wore the same yellow star to show their solidarity with the Jews, and stopping a small section of the Jewish genocide while also protesting against the Nazi occupation.

Although This story is not historically accurate, it has circulated widely because it captures the spirit of the Danish resistance in the second world war to the inhumanity of the Nazis, even as it symbolizes a profound spiritual truth: The struggle for universal justice requires that relatively privileged majorities actively join in solidarity with the most oppressed amongst them.

Perhaps this spiritual truth will animate the struggle for justice and freedom in Iran more. In this idea, consider what would happen if the priviledged majorities in Iran joined in solidarity with the most oppressed among them? What would happen if ordinary Iranians from all walks of life began to don symbols of solidarity with the the one of the most oppressed forms of religion in Iran: the Bahá'í? What would happen if large numbers of Iranian students, when required to declare their religion on the university entrance forms that prevent Bahá'í Iranians from attending university, wrote “Zoastrian” on their form? What would happen if a growing chorus of Iranians began to proclaim “we are all Bahá'í!”

If the Iranians show solidarity with the most oppressed amongst their society, the people of Iran would undoubtedly emancipate not only the Bahá'í, but also themselves. A regime that has clung to power by scapegoating cultures and religions such as the Bahá'í for all of the country’s faults, ill's and problems could not long survive a challenge like this to its ruling and oppresive ideology.

The privileged majorities in Iran need to join in solidarity with the oppressed, This is vital for the struggle for universal justice in the country, then it is time to translate this spiritual truth into a social reality in Iran, Doing this would establish the people of Iran as the standard-bearers of contemporary struggles for justice all over the world, May the glory of such a distinction one day belong to the Iranian people.

Below is a video of the fight for Freedom in Iran from, June 2009.

Thank you for reading and please share if you can.


Thursday, 17 November 2011

The Coming Storm?

Once again it seems we’re on the crossroads of history. Once again we’re witnessing the rise of Anti-Semitism, and again of something much greater not too far behind it.

In this globalised world, we all feel the effects of what happens on the other side of the planet. With the openly Anti-Jewish vandalism in Brooklyn two days after the anniversary of Kristallnacht, and the anniversary of the murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane, these combined messages from history scream out their profound message.
The murderer of Rabbi Kahane was later convicted of the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing. The five or so terror groups affiliated with that operation later went on to form al Qaeda (with the mujahidin that fought against the Soviets in Afghanistan), and we know the rest of that story... Brave soldiers and undercover agents are still risking their lives and dying from that particular chapter in history. Is there a clearer, more succinct example from history of the saying ‘they always come for the Jews first’?

And yet we’re still in the same episode in history. For more than a decade, this chapter has been unfolding before our eyes. For the last decade or so, we’ve been hearing Jewish voices asking about the purpose of demonising Israel. Where will it all lead they ask?

Then there’s the Israel/Palestine conflict being used as an excuse to legitimise every act of aggression by Muslims against Jews (and others) throughout the West. Would the Israel/Palestine conflict be so prominent in our collective conscious if there were no Muslim immigrants in Europe or America? Of course not. Why do we not hear about Thailand, the Philippines, Nigeria, Kenya? This ‘legitimising’ violence is something that happened before, and is designed to pressure political decision making in the West against Israel which the left (in the media and academia) have been totally willing to aid.

In Andrew G Bostom’s ‘The Legacy of Jihad’ he writes (on p.54) that in the 8th century, the treatment of Christian Egyptians very much depended on how Constantinople (the centre of the Christian world at the time) conducted relations with the Caliphate (Islamic Pope). He also writes that ‘when the Arabic armies suffered repeated defeats ...[the] governor of Egypt  ... unleashed a persecution against the Orthodox [Christians] in Alexandria in 704, which went on for several years.’ But over in Spain during the same period, the treatment was just the same: ‘Moreover, if one dhimmi (Christian or Jew having accepted Muslim rule) harmed a Muslim, the whole [non-Muslim] community lost its status of protection, leaving it open to pillage, enslavement, and arbitrary killing (p.56)1.

But we see more than mere persecution of Jews by Muslims in Europe today. This persecution is at a political level now, where the Muslim minorities in Europe are greater in size than those of the Jews. Therefore there is an added incentive for amoral political leaders to consider the Muslim vote over those of the Jews; today, short-sighted politicians use numbers of immigrants, not their contribution to society, too weigh up the pros and cons in their decision-making process.

Today, the ‘Nazis’ don’t have a superior army (as Hitler did), but they have oil. Today, the Quartet, established to preside over the ‘peace’ process, is all too happy to pressure Israel to implement suicidal and unjust initiatives, so that they may appease the oil-rich Arab regimes. And the single issue of oil seems to shape all policies in the West and every political decision.

The appeasement crisis in the run up to WWII cost the British their empire. When Britain finally decided to do something about the Nazis and declare war on Germany, the British had 5 military divisions, the Germans had 100. What should be clear by now is that even after 9/11, 7/7, and the riots earlier this year, Western powers can’t or won’t do enough to protect themselves, or their own minorities. This too should be a lesson for Jews living in Eurabia today.

The stunning myopia of the political elites and their refusal to see an obvious threat resonates with Israelis and their supporters, as much as it did the British public back in the 1930s. Whether it’s the international community’s criticism of Israel in defending itself or (as Caroline Glick2 put it) ‘reading between the lines of [Iranian president] Ahmadinejad’s hate speech, in order to read messages of peace’, or cries about Anti-Semitism from Muslim perpetrators in Europe being ignored, the strong tradition of politicians burying their heads in the sand is as strong as ever.

If Israel (and/or coalition) does take out Iran’s nuclear facilities, but makes the mistake of not helping Iran’s opposition to come to power, it’s clear the current environment in the West will only get worse (let's not forget the Eurozone crisis as well). And if we aren’t already in the run up to a Mid East initiated WWIII, Jews throughout the West had better get prepared for things to get much worse; because after Iran, there’s Turkey to consider, and Egypt after that. Then? Who knows. With an European intelligentsia that likes to portray everything as Israel or the Jew's fault, those in the Diaspora had better be prepared for a lot more demonization - and its consequences - when it comes time to deal with Turkey and Egypt.

We have to learn to defend ourselves, individually. Because what we saw with the riots earlier this year in the UK is only a taste of things to come, should a big war break out. Reading history, it's clear that Muslims and socialists use civil unrest and violence as a political tool (fascism). Just don't make yourselves a footnote in the long, bloody history of jihad or socialist tyranny.

It’s clear that generation after generation of Anti-Semite will prosecute us for being ourselves, for daring to identify with our historic homeland, and being a part of that homeland when Israel defends herself. This is the price, it seems, we pay for being the chosen ones.
To translate an increasingly popular saying in Israel: Kahane was right.



1. The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims

2. Shackled Warrior: Israel and the Global Jihad

How Islamic Iran is destroying their young generation

This article is to demonstrate how the Islamic regime of Iran is oppressing the youth of the country and the Fascism used to hold their grip on power.

In Summer 2011, Political agents of the Iranian regime spread out across Tehran to question toy shop owners about whether fake water guns used in a recent public waterfight had been imported from America. But Why all this fuss? What is so sinister about a water fight among playful youth at a water park? Nothing.

After joining a page/event on Face book that advertised the public water fight, a group of around 800 young men and women were amongst those who showed up at the park and They were surprised to find many others were there and just as eager to drench anyone in sight, They chased strangers and new friends around a giant water fountain, screaming and laughing as they splashed each other with water from toy guns, bottles and plastic bags and had a lot of fun.

One of the participants (who did not want to be named for fear of reprisals by the Iranian police) Said this: "We had an absolute blast. I have never had so much fun in my life, It was a very rare chance for men and women, boys and girls to hang out in a public place and have fun without being harassed and bullied by the Iranian authorities".

Pictures of the young men and women, their tight coats and colorful scarves drenched, squirting water at young men in wet T-shirts surfaced on websites and newspapers this made the Iranian authorities absolutely furious and created an uproar that reached the Iranian parliament.

Iranian Security forces are now hunting down the organizers and participants of the water  episode down through their Face book accounts and have detained many of their friends. The Face book page for Water Wars in Tehran had over 19,000 members and 22 local fight chapters for cities across Iran, including small cities like Marageh.

Earlier this month, Tehran police arrested the admins of the Face book page for Shiraz Water Wars and 17 young men and women who were playing in a water park in the southern coastal city of Bandar Abbas were detained in an Iranian prison. Authorities also paraded the detained young people on national television, forcing them to confess, a move typically reserved by Iran for political detainees or prisoners.

"Police will deal forcefully with park violators who are threatening the security and peace of our society here in Iran" The Tehran police chief said.

One of the reasons the Iranian authorities came down so extreme on the organizers and participants is because by wetting each other with water guns (regarding the women who took part) the wet clothing would show the countures and the body shape of women and this is morally prohibited in Islam, Therefore it is dangerous to take part in a water fight in Iran.

Another reason is that it is believed Ahmedinijad was paranoid that these young people were training with the water guns to form a coup and overthrow the Islamic regime, Fun fact for you Mahmoud, A real firearm is a big difference to a water gun but then again you do not know the difference between innocence and paranoia.

I have listed 3 pictures below of the water fight in Tehran and the joy on these peoples faces is priceless, They are enjoying the only chance of a little fun and freedom they can grasp and the thought of Iran quenching that joy by detaining these people in an Iranian hellhole prison just makes me sick!


-  UK JDL  -

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

The death of the false prophet Mohammed explained

The following is one of the most contradicting, brutal and as Muhammed is put to an end by a Jewish woman, also satisfying chapters in the Koran.

Muhammad died in 632 A.D, After years of leading brutal campaigns to spread and indoctrinate Islam to the Arabian peninsula, In the process Muhammed personally murdered hundreds of people and ordered the deaths of thousands and to this day his orders are still being carried out by Islamic groups all over the globe, Muhammed finally died as a result of being poisoned by a captured female Jewish slave, following his bloodthirsty attack and conquest of the Jewish oasis of Khaibar. About 2 months before the attack on Khaibar, Muhammad failed in an attempt to go to Mecca. This failure resulted in the Treaty of Hudaybiyya with the Meccan's. He returned completely humiliated in the eyes of the Meccans and in the minds of his people. To lift their defeated spirit, Muhammad blatantly lied to his followers and told them that the events at Hudaybiyya were in fact a victory when it was the complete opposite, another convenient "revelation" was given to Muhammad as proof that it really was a victory (Sura 48:1) "However, Allah was not able to deliver the Meccan's goods as booty, so Muhammad told his followers that they were going to attack and plunder the weaker Jewish settlement of Khaibar"

Allah failed Muhammad and the people of Mecca so Muhammad desperately needed a plan to keep his flock of followers in line otherwise his hand made religion would have been picked away piece by piece by sceptics and would eventually result in a large scale desertion of Islam, Muhammad simply could not allow this to happen.

So around 6 weeks after Hudaybiyya, Muhammad led his army and they launched their attack on the unprepared Jews of Khaibar while the Jews were on their way to work for the day. Khaibar was a settlement defended by a small number of defensive forts spread evenly apart from each other around the settlement so one by one Muhammad's army took control of the forts and finally, the last few remaining Jews surrendered to Muhammad and in response Muhammad had several leaders of the Jewish settlement of Khaibar beheaded, one leader (named Kinana) was brutally tortured to reveal the location where the buried treasure of Khaibar was hidden, when Kinana was near death, Muhammad then commanded that he also be beheaded, Khaibar was defeated and in ruin. Many of the surviving Jewish women and children of the settlement were enslaved by Muhammed and his troops and Muhammad naturally took the most beautiful woman for himself and married her, her name was Safiyah.

Some of Khaibar's residents decided to make a deal with Muhammad, Instead of enslaving them, which would leave the rich and beautiful orchards of Khaibar to go untended too and eventually unproductive, the Jews of Khaibar would give Muhammad and the Muslims 1/2 of everything that they produced, Muhammad then pondered on this and finally accepted the deal, with the agreement that the Jews could be expelled at his slightest whim and years later, Umar did expel the last remaining Jews from Khaibar.

Immediately following the conquest of Khaibar, a captured Jewish woman who was being used as a domestic slave by Muhammad and his troops, prepared a small feast for Muhammad and some of his men, Unknown to the Muslims was that she had laced a poison into the lamb (some debate that the poisoned meat was goat but that is beside the point) that was served at the meal, Muhammad then ate some of the poisoned lamb and died in agony as a result three years later.

Anybody with a straight thinking brain will now summarize that Muhammad was not a real prophet, he was actually a false prophet, He died as a result of eating poisoned lamb that he didn't know about.  The poisoned lamb "spoke" to him too late. Only when he realized he was dying did Muhammad "spiritualize" his suffering and coming  death. Prior to that he tried to get well.

Moses knew about his coming death (Duet 34:1-5) and Jesus knew of his future death as well (Mark 8:32, 32) Yet Muhammad was completely in the dark until he himself realized he was going to die.

Paul the apostle was bitten by a poisonous snake (Acts 28:1-6), and Paul suffered no ill effects from the bite. G-d had his hand of protection on Paul, to finish the work that Paul had laid out before him.  Muhammad died so suddenly that there was confusion as to would be the next ruler of the Islamic state. To this day, that confusion still remains. The Islamic world is divided largely because of this issue (Shia vs. Sunni) Bur wouldn't Allah, who abhors any division within the Ummah, have protected Muhammad long enough to insure that his Muslim state remain unified, and a clearly defined successor be named? So were was Allah?

In the bible Jesus predicted that false prophets would make their name in the world after him and mislead many (Matthew 24:24).  Muhammad was a perfect example of a false prophet that Jesus warned his followers about, Both Jesus and Moses knew G-d face to face, Muhammad had just a spirit or angel he called "Gabriel" speaking to him and In the end, even this angel's prayers were not answered by Allah.  Could it be that the so called "Gabriel" was preaching a false religion (Galatians 1:8) to Muhammad?  Could Gabriel have been a deceptive demon or even Satan himself?  I will leave you to decide ...

Many people debate about satan and what evil figure's from history could have been Satan in human form, Yet 99% of the time Muhammed and the birth of Islam and modern Islam are ignored, I will leave you with my theory: Every evil and oppressive empire through history has been overthrown, The 3rd Reich, Soviet Union, The Ottoman empire yet Islam is still slaughtering and oppressing innocent people as fresh as its founding days, Islam is the main evil counter-part of this world and is unstoppable when world leaders are brainwashed into ignoring it or trying to make Islam their friend, When you look for evil, You will find it.

 Thank you for reading, Please share/ forward if you can.

Below is footage of a Muslim reaction to criticism of Satan's apostle ... sorry, I mean Muhammed (Piss be upon him)...

- UK JDL -

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

EU wants to ban film on rape victims of Afghanistan

According to an article written today on the Evening Standard by Investigations Reporter Tom Harper, the EU has threatened legal action against a film maker based in London, after she made a documentary that exposed abuse of women in Afghanistan.

Film maker Clementine Malpas was hired by the EU to highlight the plight of battered wives and rape victims convicted of "moral crimes" by misogynist Afghan courts.  But 24 hours before the film was due to be released EU officials blocked its release stating they did not want to upset "relations with the justice institutions" in Afghanistan, and they have now accused Ms Malpas 30, of breaching her contract after claims the film was shown to outside viewers.

This is just another kick in the teeth to all those who put their lives in danger to highlight such plights and a disgraceful betrayal to the very women who have suffered untold abuse at the hands of their male counterparts.

Ms. Malpas obtained written consent for the film from Gulnaz 19, who was jailed for 12 years on accusation of "adultery" after being raped, and also from Farida 26, who was also jailed for "adultery" after fleeing her abusive husband.  Afghanistan is an Islamic country and Islamic countries impose Sharia Law on its residents. Under Sharia Law rape is considered "Zina" (Adultery).  Muslims obviously do not have the same moral standards that we do, neither are they able to comprehend that a woman who has been raped is a victim of a heinous crime and not a willing participant in the cheating game called adultery.

In the West, adultery (also called philandery) is sexual infidelity to one's spouse, and is a form of extramarital sex. It is originally referred only to sex between a woman or a man who is married and a person other than his/her spouse.  Rape on the other hand is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse, which is initiated by one of more persons against another person without that person's consent.

By these definitions we can clearly understand that Muslims do not possess the same moral standards or understanding of things as we in the West do.

Gulnaz and Farida both risked their personal safety to speak out about their treatment at the hands of the Afghani Judicial system and Gulnaz was filmed saying "I have to [do the film] because when everybody sees this it will be a lesson for them and these things won't happen in Afghanistan."
Her husband's cousin raped her, making her pregnant, but when she went to the police she was jailed in Kabul, where she currently is with her small baby daughter.

The EU has tried to silence the voices of these two women and G-d knows how many more have had their voices silenced despite their personal safety being at risk.  The EU insists that it is protecting the women by hiding their identities but their claims have no merit as these women are not protected, they are in jail for being victims of a crime. This truly exposes not only the malignant ideology of Islam as a perverted cult but also the mindset of EU leaders, who rather appease the Afghani Government rather than highlighting such evil practices.

The brave Ms. Malpas has accused the EU of silencing these victims against their will, and friends of Ms. Malpas said it was a bizarre position for an international delegation publicly committed to improving women's rights to have done so.

The full article can be found here .

What is more shocking is that not only EU officials are trying to silence these victims, they are also threatening Ms. Malpas with legal action under accusations of leaking her footage to outsiders.
This is very worrying since it seems that EU officials are in fact coward Dhimmis who are afraid to tackle the issue head on simply because it is caused by a belief system which they have allowed to flourish under our noses, and that belief system is called Islam.

Please share this article with as many people as possible, as it is our firm intention to expose the corrupt workings of the EU to everyone. These victims must not be silenced.  We demand this film and the evils of the Islamic ideology to be exposed. 


Monday, 14 November 2011

Why Islam should not be classed as a religion.

Religion: Most people in our Judeo-Christian society (especially the media) are afraid of talking about religion, misinformed about it and ignorant of the most basic theological concepts. And our theologians are often too specialized in their work to be able to discuss religion in its broadest outlines or our Churchmen are often so concerned with finding common ground that they gloss over and ignore the theology of Islam.

Our greatest critics of Islam confine their attack to the non-religious aspects of Islam, either its political side or its judicial side. But when we discuss political Islam or Sharia law alone, we imply that there is a religious Islam that is perfectly fine, that we don’t have to worry about. And we leave the major problems of Islamization – Muslim immigration, mosque building, the proselytizing in our prisons and military and the infiltration of our governmental institutions completely untouched but indeed untouchable.

So I think we need to step back a second and examine Islam as a whole and to broadly define the outlines of Islam – what it is and what it isn’t.
One thing we can definitely say about Islam is that is it not confined to a belief system. If it is a religion it is not a religion only. Islam is a total way of life and contains within itself a certain social system, judicial system, and political system which includes geo-political aspirations - the conquest and administration of territory.

Sometimes I compare Islam to a duck-billed platypus which superficially resembles an otter. Upon Inspection, You will find this animal has a duck-like bill, That it lays eggs, and has many other features which are not otter-like. So it cannot remain in the Animal category containing otters. It is simply too different and must have its own category. I think the same thing is true of Islam. It is far too different from the other religions to remain in the same category, it should be classified in its own category.
Secondly, I think it is obvious to Christians that Islam is its polar opposite and I believe nihilism lies between Christianity and Islam and that the morality of Islam is inverted.

Let me explain: religion supplies our world-view concerning the nature of reality. If we were to plot belief systems on a graph – on one side are religions which view G-d as good and the universe as a benevolent place – in the middle we have the view that there is no G-d and the universe is a pitiless and indifferent place, the view of material determinism which is the direction toward which our society is tending. On the other side of the view of G-d as malevolent and the universe is a vicious and unpredictable place – that G-d enjoys our suffering. This is where Islam lies.

The reason we can assert that the morality of Islam is inverted is that Islam consistently elevates material over spiritual considerations. That is, it elevates the material obedience to the dictates of the Islamic doctrine above all consideration of Truth or Goodness. Morality, conformity and even legality are all one and the same in Islam. Let me give you an example: The following are the words of the father of a failed female suicide bomber:

“'If I had known what my daughter was planning I would have told the Jews. I would have stopped her.”

“In our religion it is forbidden for a girl's body to be uncovered even at home. How could a girl allow her body to be smashed to pieces and then collected up by Jews? This is absolutely forbidden.”

We always see this pattern play out over and over again. Islamic Women are treated as if they were property because that is how they are defined by Islam.
For example, if a young girl runs away from home to marry her true love, she has in effect stolen the property that is herself from her family and the family will often try to kill her (Honour killing) to negate the theft and to assuage the shame and humiliation suffered by the family for not to being in full control of their daughter’s body as is required in Islam. In this way, Islam is totally materialistic – control of the body is everything. And the Muslim mind is focused fully on the material world.

Islam has become a substitute G-d for Muslims. Worship is defined as obedience to Islam and Islam represents the entire will of G-d for all men throughout all time, G-d's will is every single thing that happens, so if somebody disobeys Islam, It is G-ds will that he did so. If There is no difference between mans will and G-d's will to there is no G-d to seek in Islam, In Islam G-d is unknowable, transcendent and his will is all things, this is like saying there is no G-d at all.

Furthermore, when a religion becomes completely reduced to a doctrine and only a doctrine, it is no longer a living faith. It is dead. Islam may be complex and it maybe logical, but it is logic in the absence of living truth.

Religion in its broadest sense must be about the pursuit of higher value – of Truth, of Beauty and Goodness. As we learn from philosophy, the thinking used to be that these values stand apart from the world and evaluate the world. Truth is the measure of man, man is not the measure of truth. That is the essence of religious thought. And the interesting thing is that when we pursue value, as all true religions openly encourage, we incorporate those values into ourselves and as we pursue goodness, we become good, as we pursue truth we reflect truth in ourselves and we appreciate the beauty of G-d’s creation more and more. This is mostly known as spiritual growth. its goal is to lead men to G-d and lead them to experience G-d’s love.

Islam, on the other hand, subordinates everything to itself. Islam is the highest value and the spiritual values we just mentioned are thought to be entirely contained within Islam, even to be entirely contained within the Koran. Which is why after the rumor about Korans being flushed down a toilet at Guantanamo bay was started in 2005, scores of innocent people were killed and hundreds injured in rioting all over the Muslim world. Lives were sacrificed simply over paper and ink. We saw the same thing happen with the Muhammad cartoons over a supposed religious principle which concerns only the material world.

There is no higher truth than Islam, no higher good than Islam and nothing more beautiful than Islam. Islam has replaced G-d, you see, and its ultimate goal is not to lead men to seek those higher values. Islam exists to perpetuate itself, Simple.

Let’s take three simple religious concepts and look at how they are subordinated under Islam.

The first one is Faith. When we use the word faith, we mean a growing trust in a loving, fatherly G-d. a G-d who can be known, a G-d who can be approached. In Islam, G-d cannot be known, there is no bridge to him. What Muslims mean by faith is faith in the truth and rightness of Islam itself. Intellectual assent to a doctrine has replaced living faith – man’s relationship with a higher reality.

The second is prayer. When we pray we open our inner life to G-d – it is an intimate and personal communication and is often a petition for G-d to strengthen us in virtue so we will be more prepared to meet the problems in our lives.

There is nothing personal or intimate about Muslim prayer. It is communal and a rote formula. Everyone says the same prayers at the same time facing the same direction, while performing the same body movements. Just like military style drills, these so called prayers have the effect of cementing communal solidarity, but not of increasing intimate contact with G-d. Personal petitions must be addressed correctly to one of the 99 names of G-d, otherwise the prayer is lost as though G-d were some sort of giant post office. There is no intimacy between man and G-d in Islamic prayer because it is basically impossible.

The third is worship by which we mean love, adoration and gratitude all being expressed to G-d. Often this is done in the form of a song. In Islam, worship is defined as obedience to Islam and since G-d is transcendent and we cannot know him, loving him is beside the point and is certainly not essential. Obedience is everything.

This concept is also a major stumbling block to democracy because to obey man’s law in Islamic thought is the equivalent to the worship of a man. Now, while I would agree that the worship of man is broadly a characteristic of the modern world, especially if we look at the rise of science and its promise of omniscience and even omnipotence, that all things can be known and done through the agency of science. I vehemently disagree that the Islamic total belief system and total regulation of life is the answer to anything. It is certainly not a way to grow closer to G-d. It actually leads men away from G-d and focuses the mind on the material world alone from morning till night, day in and day out.

Islam is not the answer! Islam is the problem!

For those who still insist that Islam remain in the religion category, they will eventually have to concede that Islam is either a false religion or an evil religion because it leads men to do evil action's, even toward their own families, which they have many of times. Of course there is no rule stating all religions must be good or lead to good actions.

Islam is also false because it is built on the fundamental lie that Muhammad was a real prophet, rather than a man simply pretending to be a prophet in order to gain power over people. Of course one can make the same claim about Joseph Smith or L Ron Hubbard or any number of other founders of man-made religions which have been created from time to time throughout history. A religion which venerates an evil man and raises him to the level of the perfect role model for human conduct, cannot help but lead men to evil action, even jihad.

This brings us back to our main problem: Should an evil religion, which functions in the opposite way from religion as we know it, receive the same benefits and considerations as every other worthy and tolerant religion?

Religion as we have known it has been good for society. It has nurtured morality, strengthened the family, fostered public service and encouraged social harmony. Islam, on the other hand, is self-segregating and fosters ideas of Muslim supremacy and thereby sows seeds of social discord. Even its tradition of charitable giving is solely for the benefit of fellow Muslims and it utterly destroys the family through its adoption of polygamy. Polygamous marriage is not marriage. It reduces shamefully women to the status of property. Even Mormon polygamy eventually does this.

With the Arab spring we can clearly see that when the governing police state is suddenly removed, Muslim societies across descend into violence, death and chaos. religious sects fight other sects, tribes fight other tribes, looting is common and men are reduced to defending their families against their neighbours. Needless to say, this is not what we expect from religion. We expect religion to uphold morality and civilisation standards. It is clear Islam doesn’t do that.

Now despite all the evidence that Islam is an immoral religion, there is a current of modern thought seeking to elevate a laudable personal virtue, that of tolerance, over the greater social principle of justice.
But is it just to tolerate polygamy in the name of religious freedom? The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in 1878 that it is not. Is it just to tolerate the unequal right to inheritance for women? Is it just to tolerate forced marriage? Is it just to tolerate antisemitism? Is it just to tolerate the preaching of hatred toward non-Muslims? Is it just to tolerate the teaching that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims or that men are superior to women? Is it just to tolerate a parallel legal system based on inequality? 

There are things that our society cannot tolerate and expect to survive. Justice must take its rightful place above tolerance.

So to reiterate – Islam is not a religion because:

  • It is an amalgam of social, political and judicial systems as well as a belief system. It is neither one thing nor the other – Islam is unique
  • Philosophically it is as far from other religions as it is possible to be. It lies beyond nihilism and its morality is inverted.
  • In society Islam functions in the opposite manner from all other religions. Rather than producing peace and social harmony, it sows violence and social disruption.
Therefore, I believe it would be wise to reconsider Islam’s inclusion as a religion at least as far as the First Amendment is concerned. I understand the difficulties with this approach, and I know many have and will reject it, but I also think it is necessary to raise the question about what Islam really is and what it isn’t.
When you consider the effort that went into arguing whether Pluto should be considered a planet or not, or how a newly discovered insect should be classified, or what constitutes organic produce, I really don’t think the ability to classify belief systems is beyond us. At the very least we must call into question this Islam-is-a-religion trump card that its defenders have been playing so successfully. And I think it could help remove the confusion in our own ranks and allow Islam to be criticized in its entirety, not just as a political or judicial system.

We cannot fight a lie of this magnitude with half of the truth!

- UK JDL -