Thursday, 19 March 2015

AN ANALOGY BETWEEN ISLAMISM AND NAZISM: ANTI-SEMITISM IN CONTEMPORARY EUROPE

Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini and Adolf Hitler


Kuwaiti-born Mohammed Emwazi (the individual whose identity was disclosed as the eponymous ‘Jihadi-John’) frequently muttered anti-Semitic remarks during lessons, according to a former classmate interviewed by the Daily-Mail.

When their teacher was informing the class about the Holocaust in a Year-Nine lesson - Nazi Germany’s systematic and methodical genocide of approximately six-million Jews - Emwazi purportedly remarked: “Good, they deserved it.”

Emwazi allegedly harboured a resentful attitude towards Jewish populations, and deemed them accountable for the suffering of Muslims across the Middle-East, according to a fellow pupil.

The teacher told us the Nazis drew up plans to get rid of all the Jews. I heard Mohammed mutter: ‘Good, they deserved it’. I thought he was joking,” the student explained, “But later he told me that he hated all Jews and blamed them for the plight of Muslims.”


Jihadi John excercising his Islamic Culture


This type of behaviour and vituperative temperament is symptomatic of the anti-Semitic mentality that frequently accompanies the adoption of an Islamist identity.

The ubiquitous abhorrence towards Jews has been routinely appeased, and permitted to develop throughout the preposterous BDS agenda, under the disingenuous facade of “anti-Zionism”. The countenancing of anti-Semitic discrimination has demonstrably culminated in devastating consequences, accompanying a considerable increase of anti-Semitic attacks across continental Europe.

The exclusive denunciation of the Israeli state - whilst simultaneously disregarding the atrocities perpetrated by neighbouring governments - is somewhat illustrative of subconscious anti-Semitism.

With prominent journalists like Mehdi Hasan conceding that anti-Jewish sentiments are pervasive across contemporary Muslim communities - it is now incontrovertible that anti-Semitic convictions are being propagated by Islamic fundamentalists, in addition to quintessential neo-Nazis and white-supremacists.

The widespread circulation of anti-Zionist propaganda that mirrors traditional anti-Semitic conspiracy-theories (such as an international collusion of Jews who surreptitiously dictate international affairs) is indisputably exacerbating these attitudes and formulating a very poisonous attitude for Jews across continental Europe.

The abhorrent demagogue George Galloway attempts to pander to his predominantly-Muslim constituency by declaring neighbourhoods in Bradford an Israeli-free zone. People like Galloway know full well that the concepts of Israel and Judaism are inextricably linked, but still persist in arraigning the country, and presumably the population, as a whole.

Additionally, travel-advice for the city of Malmo, in Sweden, advises Jewish individuals not to conspicuously display their religion or ethnicity, for fear of retributory violence. Incidentally, Malmo has the largest Muslim population in the country.

Jews are having bricks thrown through their windows. Jews are being assaulted on the streets. European Jews are subsequently returning to Israel, their ancestral homeland, on an unprecedented scale.

Amidst the shockingly high Aliyah (repatriation) statistics, the real question remains: why are innocent European Jews being subjected to indiscriminate violence? How are they, as European citizens, responsible for geopolitical machinations that occur thousands of miles away?

The hysterical castigation of Israel and the aggrandising hyperbole that accompanies this anathematisation must be considered partially responsible for the significant increase of anti-Semitic violence.

Furthermore, vindictive attacks on synagogues in Denmark and France, respectively, and an innumerable volume of anti-Semitic assaults - of which the perpetrators are predominantly Muslim – have exemplified the numerous corresponding aspects between Islamism and Nazism.

They are essentially morally-equivalent persuasions –respectively totalitarian, fascistic, expansionist, supremacist, and uncompromisingly anti-Semitic.

When walking past houses that were known to have Jew occupants, the contemptible Emwazi was also known to shout obscenities such as “fu**ing pigs”.

This contradicts the impression carefully manufactured by terrorist-apologist organisation CAGE at their press-conference. CAGE, formerly Cageprisoners, undertook a concerted effort to portray Emwazi as an innocuous, benign young-man who was radicalised to decapitation by the security-services’ persistent harassment.

Irrespective of the fact that Emwazi had connections with many individuals implicated in terrorist-related offences, CAGE indignantly asserted that Emwazi’s trip to Tanzania was one of a tourist nature. Despite Emwazi cultivating relationships with disreputable characters - according to CAGE, Emwazi simply intended to embark on a safari. This alibi is a ridiculous attempt to vindicate an aspiring terrorist.

This whole episode clearly displays the defensive, passive-aggressive techniques of “victimhood” that are sinisterly employed by Islamists to perpetuate their insidious agendas. Facilitated by ridiculous neologisms such as “Islamophobia”, Islamists stealthily assume the role of the “victim” whilst simultaneously oppressing others.


The inexorable rise of anti-Semitism will result in significant areas of Western-Europe effectively becoming a no-go area for Jews. The Jewish contribution to European culture is inestimable, but our Governments have essentially abandoned them. As the politically-correct media painstakingly assuages the Muslim demographics, anti-Semitism in continental Europe is being swept under the carpet.



N. Singh - Sikh Activist for JDL

Saturday, 7 March 2015

UK Judge favours Assailants over Jewish victim



Dark days for Jews loom ahead. It is now a frightening fact. 
The UK courts have time and time again proven to be on the side of the criminals. And while we must still have some hope, that there are some uncorrupted people out there still, this wishful thinking is being systematically crushed. 

On 20th September 2014 a few of us (Jews) including people who were not part of the JDL, attended a "Literary festival" hosted by the racist and rabid anti-Israel and anti-Zionist Haringey Justice for "Palestinians", who were going to talk about the 'Balfour Declaration'

We (JDL) attended simply to listen to the discussion and to take our notes. We gathered some of the leaflets and literature available, took photos of some of their posters and entered the auditorium to watch the talk.

As a note, allow me to remind you that anti-Zionism IS anti-Semitism. Those who hate Zionists are those who believe Israel should not exist, therefore they are also RACIST, for they deny the identity of the Jewish people. 

The talk started around 10:30am and some 20 minutes into the talk, an Arab Zionist - Mr. Ayman Shalash (Also known as Orim Shimshom - and who has now been exposed as a traitor, a grass and a liar) walked towards the front corner of the stage and silently held a few A4 pieces of paper, extending his hands above his head. He did not say a word but simply stood there holding the papers.
Unfortunately the writing was very small and people could not see it. 

The below photos show the precise moment when he was savagely attacked by 62 years old "fragile" Mr. Andy Simons.









 Mr. Ayman Shalash being attacked by Mr. Andy Simons

A lady (In the photo above) then approaches Mr. Shalash and asks him to leave. He doesn't. Then one of the members of the 3 people panel, Mr. Andrew Simons (Photo above) strides fast towards Mr. Shalash and not only started intimidating him with aggressive shouts and body language, but also physically attacked him. This can be seen clearly from the video of the incident, that we have posted below, and from the photographs (Stills from the video) that we made for your better judgement.

Roberta Moore, who was sitting in the audience, then shouted "Hey, no violence in here!" and when the violence continued, she walked down from the audience to the stage, to try and separate Mr. Simons from Mr. Shalash, in order to stop Mr. Simons from attacking him.

When she arrived, and managed to go to Mr. Shalash's aid, Mr. Simons then grabbed her arm and jumper, and started to attack her. He then pulled her violently towards the back of the stage and subsequently towards the steps at the end of the stage, making her fall down. All this can be clearly seen in the video. 

The fall injured her left knee, which left it bruised and bleeding. She also got a big bruise on her left arm, from the force Mr. Simons was using when pulling her.

See here photo of her elbow injury
 Photo of her knee injury

While she resisted against his pulling, it was clear she had no intentions of doing anything to hurt him. And when she fell down, she did not attack Mr. Simons, she tried to move away from him. She got up and searched for her phone, in order to call the police, but realized she had lost it, and despite looking around she could not find it.  

While trying to move away she felt more people grabbing her and cornering her at the back of the stage, where there was a wall cavity, which made her exit attempts more difficult.  More people were coming towards her, as you can see in the video. 





The photos below show Roberta being attacked and pulled down the steps by Mr. Andy Simons and his pro-Palestinian mob of the "literary" festival.





In the above photo you can clearly see Roberta on the floor. 

And here.

Mr. Simons hit the wall on the process, possibly causing him the "concussion" he claimed to have suffered from a "punch" he never got. The hospital he went to, told him he had no injuries and no concussion. He was discharged straight away and told: "You will get over it". 

Mr. Simons shouting abuse at Roberta
 The independent witness watching everything (Blue t-shirt and rucksack)
Roberta tries to leave the group but a man in a burgundy t-shirt grabs her clothes.
The group push Roberta onto the corner, see the wall cavity on the left.
 Roberta cornered into a wall cavity. Mr. de Jonge comes to her aid.

This is the moment Roberta manages to escape from the mob of around 7 people or so, and sprays Mr. Assaf  - Apologies but the video (provided by the police) is not of good quality and it's hard to see it.

 
Mr. Assaf then runs towards Roberta and grabs her
  Mr. Assaf holding Roberta


 Mr. Assaf still holding Roberta, twisting her arm.

See the entire video of the incident here. 




Roberta could have used violence as a means to escape but she opted to use her defence spray, a harmless gel instead, so that she could also identify her attackers to the police. 
She didn't know her attackers so being able to identify them was important. 

However before she used the red spray, she warned them she would use it, and made clear it was not toxic. She had no intentions to use it and hoped the warning would be enough but Mr. Simon Assaf attacked her by putting his hands on her neck, grabbing it. The independent witness also confirmed, in court, that he saw Mr. Assaf grab Roberta's neck.

It happened very fast, she moved away from his grasp and from the grasp of the others, including Mr. Simons who had his hands holding her jumper, and sprayed Mr. Assaf on the lower part of his face with the gel. 
Mr. Simons was slightly behind him, and he also got part of the gel but on his forehead. 

Both of these liars claim Roberta aimed at their eyes. Photo evidence proves otherwise. (Evidence which was DELIBERATELY ignored during the trial). 

[The gel (Farbgel) is designed to leak after the initial impact, so the part where you spray is the part that will show a higher concentration of the dye. When the gel leaks, it spreads but the areas affected will look lighter than the point of impact. Farbgel is also eye safe.]

 Before she released the spray, her friend Mr. Robert de Jonge, went to her aid, by pushing into the group a bunch of rolled papers, in order to distract them from attacking her. The end of the paper may have hit Mr. Simons on his left cheek, giving him a small cut. But we cannot be sure if the cut on his cheek was caused by the papers. It's a possibility but not a fact. 

Mr. de Jonge was charged with "assault" for that.  

[Mr. Simons claimed in court that he fell to the floor with the force of the "punch" he allegedly received from Mr. de Jonge. 
He LIED. The video was played and it showed him standing up perfectly fine after the alleged assault. He did not fall on the floor. He was not punched.]

After Roberta sprayed farbgel on Mr. Assaf, he charged after her, grabbing her arms. You may observe that she did not use any force, neither to escape nor to defend herself from their attacks.

Mr. Assaf was angry that he got sprayed on his face (After attacking her). He was grabbing her aggressively and didn't want to let her leave. He said he would stay with her until the police came. Pointless really because she had no intentions to leave until she reported this attack and identified him as one of her attackers, and because she was still searching for her phone. 

When the police came, she told them the story, showed them the video of the attack (Which was filmed on Mr. Shalash's phone) and guess what? They arrested HER! Previous to her arrest, they had seen her injuries, and heard independent witnesses telling them she was attacked together with Mr. Ayman Shalash, who was at that point very distressed and inconsolable. Apparently one of the police officers threatened to arrest him for "trespassing". He was visibly shaken and extremely nervous.

None of that made any difference. PC Ross Landers and his group had orders to arrest Roberta. Orders came from the Case officer "Saima Hussain". Clue is in the name.



Saima Shaukat Hussain, of Oak Hill, Woodford Green - here with partner Marcel Bubelini


She spent 8 hours in a police cell, was offered no food or water, and was treated as a criminal. No surprises there. 

After this episode she was charged with 2 counts of "assault" and "possession of an offensive weapon". 

Of course, absolutely NOTHING was mentioned or done about the attack she was subjected to, when she defended a man who was being attacked, nor about the people who attacked her. After all, we are talking about a pro-"Palestinian" group here, and a Jew.

The "assault" was Roberta using the spray on her two attackers, and the "offensive weapon" is actually a criminal identifier, 100% legal red dye, which is marketed as a defence spray called FARBGEL.  Look it up! 

It is harmless, non toxic, and causes absolutely no damage, irritation, burns, etc. The canister CANNOT be modified to discharge any noxious substances or to be used as a weapon. It cannot cause injury or harm.  The ONLY way that it could be used as a weapon is if you throw the can at someone. Otherwise, no chance! 

So now you know. For this she was convicted of these "assaults" and of using a harmless object as a "weapon" to "cause harm".

Furthermore, neither Mr. Simons nor Mr. Assaf claimed to have been injured by this gel.  
District Judge Julia Newton however, decided on behalf of the non-complaining "victims", that they were "harmed" by it, even though they stated they were not. 

Our barrister stated in court that what she was wrongfully (and unlawfully) extending the meaning of the word "harm" as opposed to the real definition of it as per the law.

Judge Julia Newton did not specify or define what kind of "harm" had been done to the attackers, but perhaps she meant "feelings were injured". Feelings can be injured by words too. Are words now to be considered "offensive weapons"?

The only person who was deliberately targeted, attacked, injured and harmed, was Roberta. Mr. Shalash did not have any injuries.


Andy Simons with the gel on his face
- Note that he was sprayed (although he was not the immediate intended target) on his forehead (where the gel is seen to be stronger) and the gel leaked down, as it is supposed to do.
Mr. Simons lied in court, under oath, saying he was sprayed in his eye at point blank.  The above evidence proves him to be a liar. 

Here is "fragile" 62 years old Mr. Andy Simons with the Jew & Israel-hating violent fakestinian mob that is sponsored by the equally distasteful SWP (Socialist Workers Party).

 This is the lady seen in the video, trying to usher Mr. Shalash out of the stage. She is a constant fixture in all anti-Israel boycotts. Here she is seen attempting to get people to boycott Israeli produce from Tesco.

*********************************************************

Think about this carefully, because if someone attempts to rape you, and you spray the would-be-criminal with this FARBGEL, which is a 100% legal spray, you could be charged with assault. The gel won't stop the criminal though, because as I said, it is simply a criminal identifier, not a weapon. It won't hurt anyone, so whatever crime he was going to commit, he can still do it if you do not run. The only thing that you will hurt is his "feelings". 

By convicting Roberta and Mr. de Jonge of these assaults, District Judge Julia Newton is sending a message to everyone to say that you CANNOT defend yourself, even with something as harmless as that, or be defended by anyone else. At least not against pro-Palestinian mobs it seems.

This is serious, folks! This is what we are dealing with in the Magistrates and the UK courts in general. 

Now, you will have read from Jew hating websites, such as "Electronic Intifada" and others, things like:  "JDL leader convicted of assaults and possession of an offensive weapon" ... bla bla bla, and their stories will not tell you the truth, because this is what they are, stories. They are written based on lies.

They call us "thugs". I doubt they know the meaning of the word. The left has the expertise in distorting words and of changing their meanings outright. Truth therefore gets distorted in their "translation". 

There is not a single report/article showing the members of the JDL UK being violent in any occasion.  There is not a single shred of truth in their libelous claims that the JDL are aggressive or violent "thugs".

They lie, they twist the facts, they smear you and yet, they expect to be taken seriously. What a bunch of hypocrites! They have absolutely no guts to tell the truth, and that is really sickening, because the reporter for the Electronic Intifada, Mr. Asa Winstaley, was at the court all day, on both days. 

So was the Romanian freelancer Mr. Matei Clej, who told Roberta he was writing the piece for the Jewish News at the request of his editor Mr. Richard Ferrer. Mr. Clej also told her he was NOT Jewish.




Mr. Richard Ferrer of 'Jewish'News - A Modern Day Kapo


 Mr. Asa Winstaley of Middlesex - from Electronic Intifada (Left) and Mr. Matei Clej (Right).   A Jewish newspapers and an anti-Semitic one working TOGETHER to smear the JDL.

 Seems Mr. Matei Clej did not want his picture being taken.

Amazing! Two so-called "journalists" in the courtroom, as well as some of their pro-Palestinian friends, listening to everything, seeing the video being played several times, and yet they are incapable of actually telling the truth? I don't think they are that stupid, of course. This was a deliberate act to smear us Jews, the JDL and our supporters. 

Let me also tell you about the truth of the first video played at the court.
The video the prosecution provided (Which states at the end: "Property of the Metropolitan Police" was EDITED.  
And not surprisingly, it is also the same video the anti-Zionist (Jew hating and terrorist supporting) Asa Winstaley has posted on his website "Electronic intifada".  You will realize the that the footage is deliberately incomplete and therefore misleading.

Yes, the video did NOT show the beginning of the footage, which is the most important of all. The video started at the point where Roberta was already at the back struggling with Mr. Simons. 

The "police video" which was provided by the fake victims, did NOT show Mr. Andy Simons savagely attacking Mr. Ayman Shalash and Roberta.  That part was completely removed from the video.

But we had video evidence of this, and at the end of the court we managed to get it playing on the screen. 

Judge Julia Newton cannot possibly claim not to have seen these people attacking Mr. Shalash and me. She claimed to have been through all the evidence, and yet she completely ignored the facts in front of her, that Mr. Simons started the attacks. Video evidence shows this clearly. 

When Roberta left the court and got outside, the two reporters, who were sitting close and cozily together behind her during the entire court session, started taking her pictures, and Mr. Asa Winstaley asked her what she had discussed with Mr. Moshe Feiglin in Israel. She was perplexed with the utter idiocy of being asked such question. What a moron! 

The only people who knew they were due in court were the people involved, so it is safe to say that these pro-Palestinian people only came to watch the court proceedings at the request of Mr. Andrew Simons and Mr. Simon Assaf. 

And now you also know that despite the fact that "Haringey Justice for Palestinians" write on their website about them the following:

Quote

Haringey Justice for Palestinians  is an independent, non party-political organisation that campaigns for justice for the Palestinian people, advocating civil, political and Human Rights in accordance with International Law. 

Unquote

They are actually a bigoted, racist and violent political group that uses schools to host their despicable propaganda against Israel and Jews. 

Even more sickening are the so-called "Jews" (In this case the Jewish News, Ha'aretz and the Jewish Chronicle) who re-post  their garbage as if it was true or newsworthy. They never approached me to get my comments on the trial or the charges I was falsely accused of, but simply posted their lying articles online. If alarm bells are not yet ringing, then you are not yet paying attention. 

We will be appealing these ludicrous charges, and hopefully we will get a re-trial. Will keep you posted. 

UPDATE: 

Regretfully and to our utmost disgust, Mr. Ayman Shalash has failed to tell the truth, and instead decided to lie to save his own ass. Not only that, but fearful of being arrested for aggravated trespassing, and despite crying like a baby on Roberta's shoulders in the presence of the police, this little treacherous weasel, who has no morals, dignity or self respect, decided to "cooperate with the police" and lie [at their request] to incriminate his friends Roberta Moore and Robert de Jonge, so that he could avoid arrest.  

He has confessed in a private message (see below) that the police has "advised him not to press charges". 

So now you can see what a coward this pathetic individual truly is. Someone who would betray the very people who were always there to help him and save his ass when he got into trouble.












There you have it. Ayman Shalash (Aka Orim Shimshon) confessing to being a proper coward and a grass.



Next target on the list is Paul Scott.




Initially not an aggressor during the event, although, as can be seen in the stills, he witnessed Miss Moore being dragged to the ground and was perfectly fine with that.
During the sentencing the judge (a different one) got confused with Saima Hussains report that Mr de Jonge was carrying a 'shiny pole' (implying it was metal) but that during the trial Mr de Jonge was not sentenced for possession of an offensive weapon.
At this point Paul Scott, being present as a spectator, came forward claiming that he saw Mr de Jonge having a metal bar hidden inside the rolled up pieces of paper.

One wonders if he had really seen this, why didn't he bring this up during the trial in which he was a witness?


Of course the answer is because Paul Scott is a Liar, who will lie under oath to protect his women-beating friends.
As can be seen on the footage, Paul Scott had his back faced to Andy Simons from the moment Miss Moore got back on her feet all the way to the end of the situation.

Paul Scott never saw Mr de Jonge as he was busy with Ayman Shalash.

Apart from that, as Mr de Jonge stated during the trial, if he would have hit Andy Simons in the face with a metal bar, the face of Andy Simons would have been beyond repair.

Mr de Jonge passed security on the event without any problems. How likely is it to find a 'metal bar' inside a 'Community School'?

The rolled up pieces of paper that scuffed a woman-beater.
The only violence Paul Scott witnessed was that of his friend Andy Simons.



This whole episode is going to cost us thousands of pounds, but we must stand strong and fight these convictions, because if we don't,  this could set a precedent that Jews will always be accused of assault whenever they defend themselves. 

We would be very grateful for your donations. 
If you can and want to donate for our legal fund, please click on the link DONATE on our website. 

We hope that this time Truth & Justice will prevail. 





JDL UK TEAM

 

 

Thursday, 12 February 2015

AN EXCORIATION OF GEORGE GALLOWAY: THE LONG-TONGUED, STALINIST SERPENT







Picture: (George Galloway handing money to Hamas)

 
George Galloway is an unscrupulous character and malignant opportunist, who will align himself with almost any sovereign with “anti-imperialistic” manifestations, including absolutist dictatorships like Syria, Iran, and Sudan.

He is a mouthpiece for Iran’s contentious propaganda media-network, where he hosts a weekly radio-show. Press-TV entails no journalistic credibility whatsoever and frequently propounds batshit-crazy, borderline delusional conspiracy-theories pertaining to an international conspiracy of “imperialists” and “Zionists”.  Their unadulterated insanity has no inhibition: they previously suggested that the USA’s military deployment to West-African countries was illustrative of their deliberate engineering of the Ebola crisis; as to provide a pretext for an expansionist incursion into continental Africa.

His controversial appearance on Question-Time validated his reputation as a pathological-liar. When confronted with details of his past misdemeanours and indiscretions (such as his anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and friendly temperament towards terrorist-organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah) he cleverly prevaricated and digressed away from this topic, preferring instead to launch into a vituperative, rebarbative tirade against  Israel, accusing them of “murder” and extrajudicial incarceration of five-hundred Palestinian children. 

We’ve come to expect certain predictable characteristics of George; such as providing almost no evidence for corroborating his claims and no calumniation of the terrorist-organisations (such as Hamas, who he has openly professed support towards and funded) who are primarily responsible for and continually perpetuate the violence.

Conversely, prevarication is somewhat preferable to refusing to answer the question outright and dismissing the questioner – as he has a proclivity for doing so, before proceeding to terminate the call, when someone calls-up on his weekly radio-show and mentions the discrepancies and inconsistencies in his accusations.

George Galloway is truly a deplorable individual. Let’s declare our neighbourhoods a “Galloway-free zone”; in a similar fashion to how he disparaged the entire Israeli population - notwithstanding of their personal opinions and political persuasions.

#BoycottGalloway

#FreePalestineFromHamas




N. Singh - Sikh Activist for JDL UK

Sunday, 8 February 2015

The Duplicitious-Facade of Hamas


There is a disconcertingly-growing consensus among proponents of an independent Palestine, that the sinister behaviour of the fundamentalist organisation Hamas is essentially tantamount to those of “freedom-fighters”, who are pertinaciously resisting Israeli bombardments and magnanimously safeguarding the lives and property of its beleaguered civilians.

This preposterous contention is predominantly prevalent among prepubescent champagne-socialists, sanctimonious university-students, or otherwise delusional fuckwits.

Conversely, Hamas has principally demonstrated a reckless disregard for the well-being of Gazan citizens by deploying rockets from densely-populated vicinities (knowing full-well that the anticipated Israeli retaliation would culminate in a enormous amount of fatalities); exploiting and disseminating the subsequent casualties through their extremely pervasive propaganda campaign; and most intriguingly – administrating their territory in a manner reminiscent of the Taliban’s governance over Afghanistan – in accordance with theocratic jurisprudence derived from puritanical interpretations of Islamic scripture.

So much for being "freedom-fighters"...

Their clandestine political posturing and concerted attempts to present themselves as a legitimate, democratically-elected government barely conceal the ulterior motives of the organisation, which incorporate: the genocidal decimation – expressed through their ideological charter - of the ethnoreligious Jewish demographics (irrespective of what their perspective is on the conflict) and the subjugation of its population through overbearing, authoritarian, and theocratic leadership.

Occasionally, we in the West get a glimpse of Hamas’ unadulterated, pernicious convictions (and predominantly choose to ignore them), such as their rebarbative and vituperative anti-Semitic pronouncements; their jubilant celebrations of the September-11th attacks; their prolonged cordial relationships with disreputable entities such as al-Qaeda; and vociferous glorification of terrorism as a whole – notwithstanding their persistently coordinated terrorist activities on Israeli soil, which are illustrative of “resistance” and “frustration” caused by the “occupation"/ "apartheid”, of-course.

It is absolutely imperative that Hamas’ perfidious temperament and deceptive political-posturing should be exposed. While simultaneously offering a superficial condemnation of terrorism under international scrutiny, they clandestinely execute terrorist attacks on Israeli soil and exhort indiscriminate violence against innocent Israeli citizens.

Consequently, it is my profoundly-held conviction that a Palestinian autonomous government should never be perceived as legitimate, particularly whilst under the Hamas’ administration. Recognising or acknowledging Palestinian independence is tantamount to making concessions to a terrorist-organisation.

Recently, aspects of one of their periodical publications seemingly purport to glorify the perpetrators of the diabolical atrocities - that Islamofascist terrorists undertook in France.




N. Singh - Sikh Activist for JDL